UPDATE: Cross Match disputes Suprema’s claims in infringement suit, says ITC findings still valid

December 18, 2013 - 

Cross Match has issued a statement to say that the Federal Circuit has in fact affirmed that the U.S. International Trade Commission’s determination that Suprema and its reseller Mentalix infringe Cross Match’s U.S. Patent No. 5,900,993.

According to the company, the Federal Circuit has also affirmed that the ITC’s finding that the patent is valid. Further, says the company, the ITC’s determination that Cross Match’s U.S. Patent No. 7,203,344 and U.S. Patent No. 7,277,562 are valid and enforceable patents remains unchanged.

This challenges an announcement from Suprema earlier this week, in which the South Korean company said the Federal Circuit had given it a “favorable” ruling in this infringement case.

“As a leading innovator in the industry, we are very pleased that the Federal Circuit agreed with the ITC that Suprema and Mentalix infringe Cross Match’s patent,” Cross Match General Counsel, Kathryn Hutton said. ”While Suprema claims it no longer sells the infringing RealScan-10 product in the United States, the fact remains that any scanners which infringe the ’993 patent are still barred from importation. There has been no adjudication that Suprema has successfully designed around our patent.”

According to Cross Match, the Federal Circuit noted that the evidence lead the ITC to conclude Suprema (1) “was willfully blind to the ’344 patent, (2) studied and emulated Cross Match’s products before willfully blinding itself to the infringing nature of Mentalix’s activities, and (3) actively encouraged those activities.” Op.10. While the Federal Circuit determined that the ITC did not have authority to ban from importation certain Suprema products that the ITC found infringed the ’344 patent because the direct infringement occurs after the products are imported, it did “not address the Commission’s other findings on the ’344 patent.” Op.26. The Federal Circuit indicated that such post-importation infringement issues should be brought before “the applicable federal court forum.”  To that end, Cross Match has an infringement suit against Suprema and Mentalix pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s determination that integrated biometric capture devices with computer processing functionality, such as Cross Match’s SEEK, practice the ’562 patent.

“This decision upholds important intellectual property rights and provides Cross Match with the basis for future enforcement activities where necessary,” Hutton said.

Leave a Comment

comments

About Adam Vrankulj

Adam Vrankulj is an editor for BiometricUpdate.com. His background consists of online news writing, editing and content marketing. Adam has written for CBCNews.ca, BlogTO and was the editor and curator for the nextMEDIA and CIX Source publications. He has a degree in journalism and is passionate about science, technology and social innovation. Contact Adam, or follow him at @adamvrankulj