FB pixel

UIDAI tells Supreme Court it’s impossible to track citizens using Aadhaar

 

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the governing agency in charge of Aadhaar, told India’s Supreme Court that it is nearly impossible to use Aadhaar to track citizens, according to a report by NDTV.

The agency said there were several measures implemented in the law and its systems to ensure that the government could not use Aadhaar for surveillance purposes even if it were deemed legal.

The agency also suggested that too much was being made of privacy being a fundamental right.

“Nothing is private in the online era,” Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told a nine-judge constitution bench.

For the past couple weeks, India’s Supreme Court has been hearing from multiple petitions challenging the legality of the Aadhaar project to determine whether citizens are entitled to privacy as a fundamental right.

If the court rules that privacy is, in fact, a fundamental right, it could have a huge impact on the future of Aadhaar, as well as the UIDAI.

The central government also told the top court that a 10-member expert committee led by retired Supreme Court judge Justice BN Srikrishna had been established to recommend a draft bill on data protection.

The UIDAI was initially created to issue Aadhaar numbers in 2009. However, since parliament was unable to pass the law to provide legal backing for the unique identification number, the agency made the executive decision to collect personal data about citizens.

Since then, there have been several petitions persuading the top court to cease the collection of private information from citizens.

Parliament finally passed the law last year, but not before it contested ongoing claims that privacy was a fundamental right.

Since two courts had previously differed in their rulings, the Supreme Court created the nine-judge bench to make a definitive ruling.

The UIDAI, along with the central government and some state governments, has said that while privacy is protected under the Aadhaar law, it is not considered a constitutional right and should not be upgraded to a fundamental right.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Malaysia’s prime minister loses it with MyDigital ID’s slow progress

Malaysia’s leader has voiced deep frustration with the slow progress in two key national digital initiatives. This week it was…

 

IDVerse acquired by LexisNexis to boost biometric fraud protection

LexisNexis Risk Solutions has struck a deal to acquire IDVerse adding biometric fraud protection to its portfolio of analytics and…

 

Intellicheck to provide identity validation for Accio Data

Intellicheck, Inc. has announced an integration with Accio Data to streamline background screening checks for job applicants. A release from…

 

UK digital age assurance receives support from stakeholders: Reports

UK’s attempts to legalize digital age assurance technology are likely to be successful, according to media reports. In January, the…

 

Ghana unveils biometric border management system, e-gates at main airport

Ghana has upgraded its border management capabilities with the introduction of a biometric-based system to facilitate immigration controls. The launch…

 

Tender for fingerprint scanners from Ukraine cites Thales, Dermalog

Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for biometric fingerprint scanners. Tender 4200772976 calls for…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events