FB pixel

Australia’s safety code for search tools takes effect, with age verification rules

Commissioner passes first three codes of nine covering children’s online safety
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Australia’s safety code for search tools takes effect, with age verification rules
 

Like its counterparts in the EU and UK, Australia’s digital regulator is beginning to formalize its online safety codes. The eSafety Commissioner has registered the first round of codes, accounting for three of nine total codes. According to a release, they include a code related to search engine services, plus codes covering enterprise hosting services and internet carriage services. A primary goal is to protect kids from accessing pornography and harmful content online, such as sites that promote suicide, self-harm or disordered eating.

Commissioner Julie Inman Grant notes the importance of Schedule 3, the Internet Search Engine Services Online Safety Code. Inman Grant says “search engines are often the windows to the internet for all of us” – and, as such, can indirectly expose kids to all kinds of adult content.

The code applies to “any features integrated within the search functionality and the user interface of an internet search engine service, whether enabled by artificial intelligence or otherwise but does not include standalone applications or tools that are not integrated within the internet search engine service.”

It also does not apply to search tools that are primarily intended to provide the end user with results sources from the site. (For instance, it would not apply to Biometric Update’s search engine.)

Web search tools have 6 months to implement age assurance

Compliance measure 3 is worth quoting at length: “By no later than 6 months after this Code comes into effect and where technically feasible and reasonably practicable, a provider of an internet search engine service must: a) implement appropriate age assurance measures for account holders; and b) apply tools and/or settings, like ‘safe search’ functionality, at the highest safety setting by default for an account holder its age assurance systems indicate is likely to be an Australian child.”

“At a minimum, such tools and settings must filter out online pornography and high-impact violence material detected in search results.”

Likewise, compliance measure 20 says that at minimum, “a provider of an internet search engine service must take appropriate steps to test and monitor and improve the effectiveness of its age assurance measures over time.”

Again like the EU and UK, Australia’s eSafty Commissioner is just getting started. She’s pushing for additional commitments from industry on the remaining codes, which variously clever app stores, device manufacturers and – perhaps most controversially – social media services.

She says “it’s critical to ensure the layered safety approach which also places responsibility and accountability at critical chokepoints in the tech stack including the app stores and at the device level, the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign-up and first declare their ages.”

The commissioner is also pursuing modifications that address protections related to AI companions and chatbots.

“We are already receiving anecdotal reports from school nurses, that kids as young as 10 are spending up to five hours a day with AI chatbots, at times engaging in sexualised conversations and being directed by the chatbots to engage in harmful sexual acts or behaviours,” she says. “We need industry to be building in guardrails that prevent their chatbots engaging in this type of behaviour with children.”

Inman Grant says she’s awaiting input from industry on the matter – but that if she feels the proposed solutions are inadequate, she will “move to developing mandatory standards.” The sector has been given plenty of time; the safety codes were originally due to be submitted for registration assessment in December 2024, and industry has already been granted several extensions. Inman Grant has already sent back one round of draft codes, deeming them insufficient.

Per the release, the codes and standards are mandatory and enforceable and failure to comply may result in civil penalties of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (US$32.2 million) per breach.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

UK startup raises $15M to build Europe’s sovereign alternative to biometric surveillance

A British start-up has raised millions for its biometric-alternative surveillance technology. Augur, a resilience technology startup, has raised $15 million…

 

NIST concept paper explores identity and authorization controls for AI agents

A draft concept paper released by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) asks industry and government stakeholders how…

 

Age assurance community sets new goals with standard published and use exploding

“Age Assurance Has Come of Age,” crows the Draft Summit Communiqué for the upcoming Global Age Assurance Standards Summit 2026….

 

‘Big Tech’ fears and confusion dominate dialogue over UK digital ID scheme

The UK government’s digital ID consultation has begun, its detailed plan for the process finally revealed, but all that is…

 

Bunnings introducing facial recognition to 42 New Zealand stores

Hardware and garden center chain Bunnings is introducing facial recognition technology (FRT) to its New Zealand stores to prevent serious…

 

Sweden to launch government eID in December 2026

Sweden has announced that its electronic identity (e-ID) will be launched on December 1st, 2026, giving both Swedish citizens and…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events