FB pixel

Startup launches deepfake detection capable of tracing images to specific tools

Startup launches deepfake detection capable of tracing images to specific tools
 

Canada-based content analysis provider Winston AI has launched a forensic image detector that the company says can trace deepfakes back to their source.

The new tool can pinpoint which parts of an image were manipulated, according to Winston AI, as it can determine how they were altered, and which AI model or editing tool produced the changes.

“Until now, detection tools told you whether to trust an image,” says John Renaud, CEO of Winston AI. “Ours tells you exactly where not to trust it, and which tool put it there. That’s the difference between a smoke alarm and a fire investigator.”

More than 10 million people use the AI content-detection platform, which Winston AI designed for high stakes environments such as journalism and fact checking, legal evidence review, academic integrity checks and content moderation teams. In principle, it could also have value for fraud prevention teams handling images submitted for KYC checks that they suspect may be biometric deepfakes.

Instead of offering a binary “real‑or‑AI” verdict, the system analyzes images using six independent forensic techniques. These map pixel‑level anomalies such as broken camera‑sensor fingerprints, inconsistent compression, unnatural edges and noise patterns.

When combined with metadata and C2PA provenance signals, Winston AI’s tool is, when possible, capable of attributing an image to a specific generative model or editing software.

A multimodal reasoning model compiles the findings into a structured report that includes an authenticity verdict and confidence score. The software produces a written summary along with region‑by‑region manipulation breakdowns and tool attribution where possible.

The forensic image detector is available now on the company’s website in both a lightweight screening mode and a full advanced forensic mode.

Deepfake detection is an emerging area. Biometric Update and Goode Intelligence have a 58-page buyers guide, presenting commercially available options with a breakdown of the key suppliers, and what to look out for in a deepfake supplier.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

White House fraud crackdown sharpens focus on digital identity

The Trump administration’s March 6 Executive Order 14390, aimed at combating cybercrime and fraud, has prompted a significant response from…

 

Gender gaps threaten progress on global legal identity goals, Vital Strategies CEO warns

As countries work toward universal legal identity under SDG 16.9, greater focus on gender inclusion is needed to ensure women and…

 

Guyana data chief says digital ID won’t replace voter ID

Guyana’s Data Protection Commissioner, Aneal Giddings, has clarified that the country’s national digital ID is not intended to be used…

 

Biometrics at scale: EES setbacks meet growth push

The effectiveness of biometrics deployments at scale can be prone to failures of procedure or coordination, as travelers to Europe…

 

Concordium’s Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki wants to keep your AI agents in line

“Without identity, autonomous action is just autonomous risk.” So says Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki, CEO of Layer-1 blockchain protocol Concordium. Concordium has…

 

Veratad among first certified to ISO 27566 age assurance standard

Veratad is one of the first companies worldwide to achieve certification to ISO/IEC 27566‑1:2025, the newly established international standard for…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events