Explainer: Dynamic Signature
Dynamic signature is a biometric modality that uses, for recognition purposes, the anatomic and behavioral characteristics that an individual exhibits when signing his or her name (or other phrase).
Dynamic signature devices should not be confused with electronic signature capture systems that are used to capture a graphic image of the signature and are common in locations where merchants are capturing signatures for transaction authorizations.
Data such as the dynamically captured direction, stroke, pressure, and shape of an individual’s signature can enable handwriting to be a reliable indicator of an individual’s identity (i.e., measurements of the captured data, when compared to those of matching samples, are a reliable biometric for writer identification.)
The first signature recognition system was developed in 1965. Dynamic signature recognition research continued in the 1970s focusing on the use of static or geometric characteristics (what the signature looks like) rather than dynamic characteristics (how the signature was made). Interest in dynamic characteristics surged with the availability of better acquisition systems accomplished through the use of touch sensitive technologies.
In 1977, a patent was awarded for a “personal identification apparatus” that was able to acquire dynamic pressure information.
Dynamic signature recognition uses multiple characteristics in the analysis of an individual’s handwriting. These characteristics vary in use and importance from vendor to vendor and are collected using contact sensitive technologies, such as PDAs or digitizing tablets.
Most of the features used are dynamic characteristics rather than static and geometric characteristics, although some vendors also include these characteristics in their analyses. Common dynamic characteristics include the velocity, acceleration, timing, pressure, and direction of the signature strokes, all analyzed in the X, Y, and Z directions.
The X and Y position are used to show the changes in velocity in the respective directions while the Z direction is used to indicate changes in pressure with respect to
time.
Some dynamic signature recognition algorithms incorporate a learning function to account for the natural changes or drifts that occur in an individual’s signature over time.
The characteristics used for dynamic signature recognition are almost impossible to replicate. Unlike a graphical image of the signature, which can be replicated by a trained human forger, a computer manipulation, or a photocopy, dynamic characteristics are complex and unique to the handwriting style of the individual. Despite this major strength of dynamic signature recognition, the characteristics historically have a large intra-class variability (meaning that an individual’s own signature may vary from collection to collection), often making dynamic signature recognition difficult. Recent research has reported that static writing samples can be successfully analyzed to overcome this issue.
Source: National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)
Article Topics
authentication | behavioral biometrics | fraud | identity management | signature recognition | signature verification
Explainer: Dynamic Signature http://t.co/ki2PPD5D
Explainer: Dynamic Signature http://t.co/RQQsQQTx
Dear Stephen,
thank you for the article. Maybe it is interesting for companies to know “What results can be expected from dynamic signature verification”?
IDCAR did a study exactly on that topic in 2011. All signature verification solutions participating in the 2011 IDCAR conference were evaluated by forensic experts using different testing sets. The task was to determine whether a particular signature had been written by the author of the reference signatures or if it had been forged by another writer. In all experiments, twelve known reference signatures were presented to the systems.
IDCAR evaluated the systems according to several measurements. They generated ROC-curves to see at which point an equal error rate was reached: i.e. the point where the false acceptance rate (forged signature being accepted as genuine) equals the false rejection rate (genuine signature being rejected). At this specific point they also measured the accuracy, i.e. the percentage of correct decisions with respect to all queried signatures.
We could achieve with our solution an accuracy of 96.27%, a false acceptance rate (FAR) of 3.70% and a false rejection rate (FRR) of 3.76%.
http://www.xyzmo.com/en/NewsEvents/news/Pages/xyzmowins2011SignatureVerificationCompetitionforOnlineSkilledForgeries.aspx
Yea…am working on “facial recognition system” am using voronoi as the model and am implementing with matlab, I am done with the locating stage, segmentation stage, now am having problem with the detecting stage and the extracting stage, can anyone help please? Please send to apuabi@yahoo.co.uk