FB pixel

Privacy concerns raised over facial recognition technology in New York City

 

A recent New York Daily News opinion-editorial article by Clare Garvie and Alvaro Bedoya of the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law drew attention to privacy concerns regarding Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s plans to acquire facial recognition technology to scan the 800,000 drivers that commute daily at the nine bridges and tunnels connecting the city’s boroughs.

First announced last October, New York City’s MTA is currently in the early stages of acquiring face recognition technology.

Residents of New York City have been subjected to facial recognition scanning for some time. The New York Police Department has been quietly using the technology to investigate crimes since 2011.

According to a former NYPD official who helped set up the facial recognition unit, the division has conducted “more than 8,500 facial recognition investigations, with over 3,000 possible matches, and approximately 2,000 arrests” as of last year.

Meanwhile, body-worn cameras are expected to be issued to all uniformed officers in the near future. The technology captures a photo or video of an unknown face and compares it to a database containing mugshots, driver’s license photos and a watchlist of wanted individuals, then provides a list of potential matches.

The authors argue that New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo should not impose real-time face scanning on New York residents unless the state first implements the necessary regulations to “safeguard privacy and civil liberties”.

Currently, there are no regulations in place which poses significant “threats to the privacy, civil rights and civil liberties of millions of innocent New Yorkers,” the article states.

The article highlights several issues regarding the NYPD’s use of face recognition technology, including its inaccuracy (making more mistakes than other forms of biometric identification), its apparent racial bias (misidentifiying African Americans more than people of other races), and most notable, implementing the technology largely in secret.

The department has declined to provide information about the facial recognition system in response to requests filed under New York’s Freedom of Information law, according to the report.

The agency has offered a series of reasons for this, such as claims that the records were exempt from disclosure, that they were “unable to locate” the documents requested, and that the documents are exempt from disclosure because they discuss trade secrets or confidential police procedures.

Finally, the article emphasizes how face recognition is “too powerful to be secret” as it “raises too many concerns to operate without transparency into how it is being deployed and what controls have been placed on its use.”

“Communities have a right to know how they are being policed, particularly when the technology used is as invasive — and error-prone — as face recognition,” the article states.

Article Topics

 |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Groups reject expiry date for digital ID cards in Kenya as govt defends move

Some civil society organizations in Kenya say they want an explanation from the government with regard to the institution of…

 

Idemia forensic software extracts human faces, tattoos for investigative leads

Even when a facial recognition system is integrated within a state or federal investigative agency, human intervention is necessary. In…

 

Nearly three quarters of U.S. adults worry deepfakes could sway election: Jumio

The hour is ripe for political deepfakes. The U.S. presidential elections are still four months away, and the campaign has…

 

Controversial US privacy bill rewritten again, but path still unclear

The already controversial American Privacy Rights Act of 2024 (APRA), which was originally introduced in April by U.S. Senate Commerce…

 

Selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs: Examining the latest revision of ETSI TR 119 476

By Sebastian Elfors, Senior Architect at IDnow In July 2024, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) published an updated revision of…

 

Contractor needed for project to identify civil registration hurdles in Chad

A request for the Expression of Interest (EOI) has been launched for a consultancy firm to identify challenges that stand…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events