FB pixel

Internal CBP document shows matches in initial biometric pedestrian border checks not satisfactory

 

Iris and facial biometric technology used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to identify pedestrians for its Biometric Entry/Exit program has failed to provide matching results meeting a “satisfactory” level, according to a document obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).

EPIC obtained the “Southwest Border Pedestrian Field Test,” (PDF) an internal document published in December 2016 by the Office of Field Operations Entry/Exit Transformation Office, as the result of a lawsuit against CBP, which it has now settled, with CBP paying EPIC’s $12,000 legal fees. The Field Test was meant to serve as “an initial feasibility study of the chosen technology and biometric modalities,” with the results informing future tests.

The document shows that face recognition “on-the-move” was the most promising technology for processing large traveler volumes, in terms of accuracy and speed, while kiosks showed potential for smaller volumes. The heavily redacted document also suggested that CBP should monitor the evolution of iris recognition technology. In the test, facial biometric capture rates were observed to be significantly higher than iris capture rates.

On-the-move lanes were found to process 4.6 travelers per minute, while “pause-and-look” systems averaged 2.7 travelers, and kiosks 1.9 travelers.

The vendor of the iris recognition system was redacted, along with details about “reasons for process failure,” but CBP says it could not determine the specific cause of failure due to the technology being proprietary. As would be expected, facial recognition kiosks had the best ratio of properly identified to wrongly rejected travelers. Document photos on file with CBP provided better match scores than the gallery of inbound images in the Field Test, and CBP says environmental factors were mitigated better than human ones, even in outdoor settings. More than 10 percent of those processed between 14 and 79 years old did not posses WHTI-compliant documents, and therefore had to be processed manually. This process was faster, however, due to the redistribution of resources enabled by the biometric systems.

A new CBP trial of facial recognition technology for pedestrians at the Southern border was announced last September.

EPIC called on Congress in December to suspend the use of facial recognition until privacy safeguards can be established, and a similar call was made by Senators from each party in March.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Private, effective age verification is possible: Australia age assurance technology trial

“Age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective.” This is the key finding of…

 

Social platforms ‘sufficiently high risk factor to require age verification’

Eleven countries have signed a letter, submitted to the European Commission and provided to MLex, advocating for mandatory age verification…

 

UK lays out privacy policy for One Login identity verification

Data collected for Gov.uk One Login will not be used to target advertisements or profile users, and selfie biometrics for…

 

Fortinus Global, MD Tony Smith to advise Paravision on border biometrics expansion

Paravision is ready to support national-scale identity programs with Fortinus Global as its new strategic advisor for border security systems….

 

Facebook and its 3 billion users get passkeys, Microsoft deleting passwords

Facebook is introducing passkeys as the social media platform jumps on the passkeys wagon. While Facebook might have fallen out…

 

Spain invests in chips and cybersecurity center, with digital identity firms involved

Spain is establishing a cybersecurity and microelectronics center as part of its digital transformation. The €19.6m ($22.4m) investment by Spain’s…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events