FB pixel

Northrop Grumman shareholders demand rights report over DHS biometric database contract

Northrop Grumman shareholders demand rights report over DHS biometric database contract
 

A group of shareholders are planning to challenge Northrop Grumman leadership over the human rights implications of its lucrative new contract with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

Northrop Grumman won the $95 million, 42-month contract for the first two development stages of the OBIM’s new Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology (HART) biometric database. The Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment (Tri-CRI) filed a shareholder resolution in November, following failed discussions with management, the EFF says.

Tri-CRI notes in the shareholder resolution that corporations have human rights responsibilities under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), and that U.S. government sales made up 85 percent of Northrop Grumman of its 2017 sales. The group expresses concerns that HART may be used with algorithms that have inherent racial bias, and echoes an EFF warning that it could have a chilling effect on democratic freedoms.

“The HART database will amplify the surveillance capabilities of government agencies, presenting risks to privacy and First Amendment rights and causing harm to immigrant communities,” Tri-CRI writes in the resolution. “Through the provision of services through the DHS contract, Northrop Grumman may be linked or contribute to these adverse human rights impacts.”

The group also says that Northrop Grumman does not disclose how its Human Rights Policy is operationalized to reduce the risk of adverse impacts.

“Investors are unable to assess how Northrop Grumman embeds respect for human rights into the process for vetting and implementing contracts with the U.S. Government or foreign governments, or the effectiveness of any systems which may be in place to prevent or mitigate human rights risks.”

The shareholders are requesting that the company’s Board of Directors prepare a report on its management systems and Human Rights Policy implementation processes.

Voting on the resolution will take place May 15.

OBIM Identity Operations Division Director Patrick Nemeth told Biometric Update that there are necessarily a lot of constraints on DHS’ biometrics agency, as stewards of the data.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

GSA biometrics evaluation raises scope and purpose questions ahead of pilot

An evaluation of biometric identity verification technologies recently conducted by the U.S. General Services Administration assessed their accuracy, both overall…

 

PimEyes says Meta glasses integration could have ‘irreversible consequences’

Two Harvard students made headlines after converting Meta’s smart glasses into a device that automatically captures people’s faces with facial…

 

Police use FRT in exactly the ways critics fear: Washington Post

Police in the U.S. are making arrests based on facial recognition technology, and those who are being arrested don’t know…

 

Hong Kong gets more cameras sparking fears of repression

More streets in Hong Kong are being filled with cameras with facial recognition, sparking fears over the technology’s potential for…

 

RAND warns of hostile use of AI deepfakes, risks to privacy, democracy

Of the many risks that are explored in a new RAND Europe report, one of the most pressing involves rogue…

 

Parsons gets $1.9M US Army technical direction letter for next-gen biometrics

The US Army granted a technical direction letter worth $1.9 million to Centreville, Virginia-based Parsons Corporation for the acquisition of…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events