FB pixel

Seyfarth establishes biometric privacy group to help businesses cope with patchwork of state laws

 

Law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP is launching a Biometrics Privacy Compliance & Litigation Group to help businesses comply with the patchwork of state privacy laws, and defend them against potential class actions.

Seyfarth has offices in Chicago and Washington, D.C, and was one of the first firms to defend an employer in a lawsuit brought under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), according to the announcement. Since then, the firm has maintained a docket of biometric privacy class action cases across the country, and partnered with clients to proactively address issues raised by biometric privacy laws.

The new group is a multidisciplinary group of more than 25 attorneys, headed by Labor & Employment attorneys Karla Grossenbacher and Thomas Ahlering.

“Today, more and more clients are turning to biometric technology in the workplace, while legislation across the country concerning biometric privacy continues to accelerate,” says Grossenbacher. “With this rapidly shifting landscape, advice from counsel that has significant experience with biometric privacy compliance issues is invaluable.”

“Beyond compliance challenges, we are uniquely positioned in defending both class action and labor and employment related litigation—helping clients navigate the novel litigation theories being tested in the courts for the first time in this cutting-edge area of the law,” explains Ahlering.

The Biometrics Privacy Compliance & Litigation Group will work with clients primarily in counseling and compliance, class action litigation, and assisting in legislation monitoring and lobbying efforts.

Several other firms have recently established biometric privacy practices to help businesses deal with BIPA suits, which have increased in number after the State Supreme Court ruled that procedural violations constitute legal harm.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biden executive order prioritizes privacy-preserving digital ID, mDLs

In one of his last official acts as President, Joe Biden on Thursday issued a robust new executive order (EO)…

 

Problem with police use of facial recognition isn’t with the biometrics

A major investigation by the Washington Post has revealed that police in the U.S. regularly use facial recognition as the…

 

Sri Lanka considers another tender to solve passport crisis

Sri Lanka’s government is likely to open another tender for e-passports after a legal dispute caused a backlog of thousands…

 

Age assurance gets warm early response from U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court appears to be leaning toward support for Texas’ age assurance law, as it weighs a host…

 

State of passkeys 2025: passkeys move to mainstream

More than 1 billion people have activated at least one passkey according to the FIDO Alliance – an astonishing number…

 

Ofcom publishes highly anticipated age assurance statement

Ofcom has published its Age Assurance and Children’s Access Statement. The much-anticipated statement includes guidance on “highly effective age assurance”…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events