FB pixel

Amnesty pushes for ban on facial recognition use for mass surveillance by police, government

Amnesty pushes for ban on facial recognition use for mass surveillance by police, government
 

Amnesty International is supporting the Algorithmic Justice League, the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation in their fight against biometric facial recognition technology use for mass surveillance by law enforcement and government organizations, the human rights organization announced. Amnesty is pushing for a “a ban on the use, development, production, sale and export of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance purposes.”

The organization fears facial recognition technology could worsen police violations of human rights and prevent peaceful protests due to racial profiling and discrimination. Amnesty further accuses law enforcement of “violating people’s human rights daily out on the streets.” It is concerned about the increasing use of facial recognition technology in policing and to identify protesters in the U.S., which it says could lead to human rights violations as police target Black communities.

Amnesty points out that NIST’s study on demographic disparities in facial recognition “measured higher false positives rates in women, African Americans, and particularly in African American women,” while researchers at Georgetown University warn that bias may also be generated by the high number of black faces on U.S. police watchlists.

NIST Biometric Standards and Testing Lead Patrick Grother told Biometric Update in an interview that the debate about algorithmic bias was missing a lot of specificity prior to its report, and the report showed wide divergence between algorithms in terms of consistency of performance for different demographics.

Accuracy rate for marginalized or disadvantaged groups is a concern pointed out by Amnesty, in the context of identification and mass surveillance. Facial recognition technology enables random surveillance, collection, storage and processing of biometric data “without individualized reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing,” interfering with the right to privacy and peaceful assembly. States are responsible for ensuring people’s right to peaceful assembly, freedom of expression and anonymity, Amnesty argues.

In 2019, the use of facial recognition in law enforcement was banned in San Francisco and Oakland in California, and Somerville and Brookline in Massachusetts. Police and ICE facial biometrics system in San Diego was shut down in January to comply with new state law.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics has been drafted into the battle between AI fraud and AI defenses

Biometrics implementations for public services are expanding in countries around the world, even as AI-enabled fraud and deepfakes threaten online…

 

Oversight report fuels urgency of Congressional push for TSA biometrics reform

At a time of intensified scrutiny of the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) expanding use of facial recognition technology (FRT) at…

 

Chad issues biometric IDs to thousands of refugees with Idemia tech, UNHCR’s help

Refugees in Chad can now apply for a legal identity to bring them an important step closer to social and…

 

Moldova launches digital ID card, takes another step to align with eIDAS

Moldova has reached several milestones towards complying with European Union regulations on electronic identification over the past months. On April…

 

MOSIP team in Sri Lanka to run tests on digital ID platform

A team from MOSIP (Modular Open-Source Identity Platform) has travelled from India to Sri Lanka to test the minimum viable…

 

Laos readies national digital ID card rollout

Laos is ready to take its nationwide digital ID card system to the next stage. The Southeast Asian country’s Department…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events