FB pixel

Jumio argues for SDK-based biometrics over APIs and web apps for online identity verification

 

identity document and smartphone

The ability to leverage the built-in features of smartphones for better automatic document capturing is a major benefit to performing online biometric identify verification through an SDK, according to a Jumio blog post.  Eleven advantages of mobile SDK-based implementations over mobile and desktop web integrations and APIs are explored in the post.

Automatic data capture enables more accurate data extraction from the ID document, as optical character recognition (OCR) technology can pick up the biographic data the document includes. Jumio’s SDK also looks for the machine-readable zone (MRZ) of a passport or barcode of a two-sided driver’s license, and does not capture the image otherwise, which allows it to avoid processing incorrect documents. Liveness detection is not available in many APIs, according to the post, forcing customers to find workaround to build the capability in, or accept heightened risk from spoof attacks.

Jumio says its mobile SDK has resulted in a 20 to 30 percent reduction in drop-offs compared to API implementations, as the user journey is more intuitive and because of the document capture advantage. Fraud attempts are 50 percent lower than with web-based image capture methods, according to the post, and processing for mobile SDK transactions is 30 percent faster than web or API methods, due to the more intuitive interface, and better data capturing with higher-quality images. Jumio’s new NFC chip-reading capability can also accelerate the process.

SDKs can also accommodate a wide range of end-user devices, and client organizations can customize the interface with their branding. Simplicity of implementation with documentation and assistance from account managers and solution engineers, and the user experience of a single click to select country and document type are also advantages to its SDK-based approach, Jumio argues.

There are trade-offs associated with each implementation method, the post concludes, and understanding them and the impact they have on fraud, verification and user speed is necessary to making an informed decision about which to choose.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events