FB pixel

Jumio argues for SDK-based biometrics over APIs and web apps for online identity verification

 

identity document and smartphone

The ability to leverage the built-in features of smartphones for better automatic document capturing is a major benefit to performing online biometric identify verification through an SDK, according to a Jumio blog post.  Eleven advantages of mobile SDK-based implementations over mobile and desktop web integrations and APIs are explored in the post.

Automatic data capture enables more accurate data extraction from the ID document, as optical character recognition (OCR) technology can pick up the biographic data the document includes. Jumio’s SDK also looks for the machine-readable zone (MRZ) of a passport or barcode of a two-sided driver’s license, and does not capture the image otherwise, which allows it to avoid processing incorrect documents. Liveness detection is not available in many APIs, according to the post, forcing customers to find workaround to build the capability in, or accept heightened risk from spoof attacks.

Jumio says its mobile SDK has resulted in a 20 to 30 percent reduction in drop-offs compared to API implementations, as the user journey is more intuitive and because of the document capture advantage. Fraud attempts are 50 percent lower than with web-based image capture methods, according to the post, and processing for mobile SDK transactions is 30 percent faster than web or API methods, due to the more intuitive interface, and better data capturing with higher-quality images. Jumio’s new NFC chip-reading capability can also accelerate the process.

SDKs can also accommodate a wide range of end-user devices, and client organizations can customize the interface with their branding. Simplicity of implementation with documentation and assistance from account managers and solution engineers, and the user experience of a single click to select country and document type are also advantages to its SDK-based approach, Jumio argues.

There are trade-offs associated with each implementation method, the post concludes, and understanding them and the impact they have on fraud, verification and user speed is necessary to making an informed decision about which to choose.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Financial institutions stumbling into phishing-resistant MFA gaps, report warns

Financial institutions seem aware that phishing is worsening, but that awareness has not translated into stronger authentication across the workforce….

 

Proof, Enigma link KYB to authorized people, AI agents with biometrics

Proof and Enigma have launched Business Certificates, a cryptographic credential that connects a verified business identity to the people and…

 

Investors back Lissi, Gataca’s expansions to meet EU Digital Identity Wallet moment

A pair of European digital wallet developers have new resources to pursue market share in the nascent continental ecosystem for…

 

New Incode age estimation tool processes biometrics on-device

Prompted by the introduction of online safety regulations globally, Incode has released an on-device age estimation product. An announcement from…

 

Western Australia privacy commissioner not consulted on police facial recognition trial

The Office of the Information Commissioner of Western Australia (OIC WA) says it was not invited to participate in any…

 

Toppan, Raonsecure pilot cross-border VC interoperability between Japan and Korea

Toppan and Raonsecure have launched a digital identity proof of concept (PoC) pilot that generally aims to build a Japan-Korea…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events