FB pixel

DHS is failing in risk management for new biometric ID system — report

 

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

It is hard to imagine an information system — a biometric identity management system, no less — that has been asked to work without a major upgrade for 30 years. But it is not hard to find.

That would be Ident, the automated biometric ID system managed by the U.S. government’s Office of Biometric Identity Management. It is the focus of a new report by the Government Accountability office, which wants to know why Ident has not been retired yet.

The Department of Homeland Security was due to replace Ident with the Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology, or HART, system this year, but it is delayed.

By federal government standards, HART is not too late. The $4.3 billion project, begun in 2016, is now expected to be fully operational by 2024. But still, it is not a good look for a department viewed by many as the final barrier between American lives and those who wish to take them.

The GAO was tasked with accounting for the delay; national security, law enforcement and immigration officials need the data for critical decision-making.

Among the problems identified with development of the biometrics project, GAO analysts found that the DHS CIO was using outdated program-review policy, which likely has resulted in critical departmental IT programs would not know about newer specific process requirements.

And the department has fully implemented four of seven risk-management best practices. Three are partially implemented, and, according to the GAO, there are plans to complete only two of the remaining practices.

That could hamper the Homeland Security Department in its ability to “effectively monitor the status of risks and mitigation plans.”

Analysts recommended that project staff keep records of risk-mitigation discussions, including those about the resources that required to handle risk.

Similarly, they write that risk owners must maintain accurate and status updates for each mitigation plan.

Perhaps more alarming is the office’s finding that the way IT purchases are handled has “contributed to an increased level of risk for the program,” and could cause more cost overruns and delays.

The government is not, for example, “fully reviewing the contractor’s work products,” monitoring costs or maintaining traceability of requirements.

It is up to the DHS to accept and implement the GAO recommendations.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics cutting the line of in-person payments innovations: Mastercard

Mastercard sees biometrics for in-store payments as a part of a broader shift towards seamless interactions of all kinds, as…

 

New South Wales’ government is investing millions in digital identity

New South Wales’ decentralized digital identity program is getting a cash infusion from the Premier Chris Minns’ government, which has…

 

Innovatrics cuts fingerprint error rate by 20%, upgrades SmartFace platform

Innovatrics has reported its best-yet scores in NIST’s fingerprint biometrics testing, and added a new feature to its facial recognition…

 

Canadian cruise terminal gets Pangiam face biometrics for ID verification

The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have joined forces to implement face biometrics for…

 

Atlantic Council stresses importance of DPI, data for stronger digital economies

The Atlantic Council has highlighted the importance of digital identity and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in birthing and growing strong,…

 

Sri Lanka extends bid deadline for national digital ID project

The Government of Sri Lanka has extended the deadline for the submission of bids for the procurement of a Master…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events