FB pixel

Will AI regs take a decade to write in EU? History says maybe so

Will AI regs take a decade to write in EU? History says maybe so
 

If the speed at which Europe’s General Data Protections Regulation evolved from interesting idea to iconic privacy regime is an indication, gelling efforts to build AI standards might be many years off.

Reuters reported this week on a pair of European parliamentarians who want to build momentum behind GDPR-level regulations for AI generally and facial recognition particularly.

The data protection rules certainly were considered ambitious to some in related industries, but it is possible that lawmakers could push for the ultimate regulation — banning facial recognition.

At the moment, the European Commission is chewing over a draft of regulations. As Reuters reports, a draft would have to be approved by the European Parliament and European Union nations before it can even be voted on.

Facial recognition is looking like a political lightning rod within the movement for AI regulation.

Members of Parliament Dragos Tudorache and Alex Voss are scouting obstacles to regulatory success, and both are focused on facial recognition.

Tudorache told Reuters that the European Commission would prefer it be used by law enforcement agencies for high-stakes crimes like terrorism. He himself has said there is a legitimate role for face biometrics. Likewise, Voss opposes a ban.

Of course, those positions are not exactly defining. The chances that even a minority of EU nations push for a ban are small.

Politicians will have years to find safe (for their political careers) positions on the matter.

The germ of the GDPR dropped almost as soon as its predecessor, Directive 95/6/EC, was signed in 1995 amid grumbling about omissions and short-sighted provisions.

In 2009, the commission held a conference about challenges to privacy. Eighteen months later, commission members approved a strategy for shielding a person’s personal data government-wide while simultaneously greasing the paths for data sharing around the EU.

It was not until 2012 that the commission formally proposed large-scale reform of privacy protections within the directive. What followed was extensive debate, studies and legislative protocols.

It would be another six years until the GDPR saw ink. And just this month, Ireland handed out its first GDPR fine to Limerick for unlawful surveillance operations.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Will Scotland be the first nation to pass primary legislation covering live FRT?

The Scottish privacy commissioner continues to express consternation over the potential use of live facial recognition by Police Scotland. Meanwhile,…

 

France Identité app launches sandbox for iOS, proves age check privacy bona fides

France Identité, the French government’s mobile app for digital identity verification, has made its sandbox build available in iOS. Writing…

 

Digital ID success at scale hinges on tech, governance, adoption: IN Groupe

A study by French identity provider IN Groupe has established that digital identity systems succeed at scale only when countries…

 

New book makes case for DPI as fully integrated ecosystem

Digital development specialist Pedro Tavares has published a book that outlines how governments can successfully build digital states with digital…

 

Agentic AI pushes financial sector toward continuous identity

Agentic AI is forcing a rethink of identity and authentication in payments, as systems designed for human approval struggle to…

 

New Reality Defender Ethics Committee not mere theater, says CEO

“Most ethics committees are theater. This is not one of those.” So begins a new post from Reality Defender CEO…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events