FB pixel

Russia tries to revive twice-bumped biometric surveillance net, put it near Ukraine

Russia tries to revive twice-bumped biometric surveillance net, put it near Ukraine
 

A biometric surveillance system that was only partially built across Russia before being shut down might get a new life thanks to the Ukraine war. It has been pitched as a way to deter and prosecute acts of terrorism.

State officials want to put cameras and other sensors in Crimea and other Russian-controlled areas bordering Ukraine, according to translated coverage by Kommersant. (Russia’s government has biometric plans for finance firms, too.)

Kommersant is owned by Russian metals and mining oligarch Alisher Usmanov.

If the 18-month, 15 billion-ruble (US$279 million) safe city plan is approved, it would be another indication of how long the central government thinks the war will continue. If Ukraine is conquered quickly, as the government has said will happen, there would be no more need for biometric surveillance in surrounding territory than anywhere else in the nation.

But there are numerous international sanctions and bans in place designed to make Russia reverse its announced intention to absorb Ukraine, a notable industrial, cultural and agricultural center in the world. It had previously been ruled by the Soviet Union before that government fell to become the Russian Federation.

The Kommersant story points out that three tech vendors unilaterally decided to stop selling to or in Russia – South Korea’s Samsung and Dell and Intel, both based in the United States. Their absence and that of other hardware and software firms will not make a difference, according to a named Russian official.

Domestic production, warehoused goods previously bought from foreign firms and purchases from Southeast Asian companies would fill the needs, according to the Kommersant article.

Russia’s Ministry of Emergency Situations in 2014 announced the creation of the Safe City program in 2014, to be operated by conglomerate Rostec (or, Russian Technology). Six years later, preliminary biometric surveillance projects had been launched for 16 billion ($297 million) rubles.

The central government cut its losses when officials asked for another 150 billion rubles ($2.8 billion) to finish the project, according to the article. There was a subsequent unsuccessful attempt to resurrect it in more peaceful times.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics adoption strategies benefit when government direction is clear

Biometrics providers have major growth opportunities ahead where there is clarity about their role. What part governments play in digital…

 

Biometric Update Podcast digs into deepfakes with Pindrop CEO

Deepfakes are one of the biggest issues of our age. But while video deepfakes get the most attention, audio deepfakes…

 

Know your geography for successful digital ID adoption: Trinsic

A big year for digital identity issuance, adoption and regulation has widened the opportunities for businesses around the world to…

 

UK’s digital ID trust problem now between business and government

It used to be that the UK public’s trust in the government was a barrier to the establishment of a…

 

Super-recognizers can’t help with deepfakes, but deepfakes can help with algorithms

Deepfake faces are beyond even the ability of super-recognizers to identify consistently, with some sobering implications, but also a few…

 

Age assurance regulations push sites to weigh risks and explore options for compliance

Online age assurance laws have taken effect in certain jurisdictions, prompting platforms to look carefully at what they’re liable for…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events