FB pixel

Think tank says biometric monitoring of asylum seekers is better for all than detention

Think tank says biometric monitoring of asylum seekers is better for all than detention
 

An open-society think tank pushing for fair enforcement of immigration policies has published a defense of the United States’ biometric Alternatives to Detention program.

The Niskanen Center says the program is an effective and comparatively thrifty extension of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement daunting mission. It does not do enough, however, to protect the privacy of enrollees and those who may show up in the background of a video check-in.

With Alternatives to Detention, or catch-and-release, as opponents of the immigration program call it, ICE or an immigration judge decides an asylum seeker can bypass a detention center and be remotely supervised. Immigration proceedings take an average of 2.3 years to be resolved as of this month, according to TRAC Reports.

One option for monitoring asylum seekers is a government-issued phone loaded with GPS software and SmartLINK, a face biometrics scanning app.

The biometric app, made by BI Inc., a subsidiary of private prison firm GEO Group, monitors a person’s location and enables voice and video calls, making it easier for users and case workers to check in. ICE agents also can set calendar reminders for required appointments.

According to reports from immigration advocacy groups, SmartLINK requires users to submit contact information for five family members and friends, which brings them into a system many would prefer to avoid.

About 90,000 people were using some aspect of the Alternative program during the first fiscal quarter of 2021. About 26,000 people were using SmartLINK, according to ICE. Another 28,000 were being monitored with GPS. And 32,000 people were enrolled in a telephone voice recognition service.

The government in fiscal 2020 spent $149 million on ATD, according to ICE. The fiscal 2021 budget rose to $440 million.

Niskanen says Alternatives is significantly less expensive than housing people in detention centers and is a more humane alternative for people caught in a civil law situation, not criminal law.

However, the organization points out that the program can create significant privacy problems for asylum seekers, there family and friends and even people who inadvertently walk in front of a SmartLINK camera.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Half a million shoplifters can’t be right

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner When Napoleon said that we were a nation of shopkeepers,…

 

Fight misinformation with IDV for tiered anonymity on social media, paper argues

Social media and its effects on our society is an ongoing conversation. Some governments are considering banning social media for…

 

Hackathon spotlights role of Philippines national ID in effective service delivery

Institutions that are yet to integrate their services with the Philippines national ID Authentication platform have been called upon to…

 

Sri Lanka promotes outcome-based procurement for a robust digital economy

A significant transformation in Sri Lanka’s public procurement system, is paramount in the journey to advance Sri Lanka’s digital economy,…

 

Private, effective age verification is possible: Australia age assurance technology trial

“Age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective.” This is the key finding of…

 

Social media needs age verification for users under 15, say 11 EU member states

The pressure to impose age checks for social media platforms is growing in the EU, and regulators and providers are…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events