FB pixel

Data collection during COVID-19 normalized surveillance, says civil liberties organization

Categories Biometrics News  |  Surveillance
Data collection during COVID-19 normalized surveillance, says civil liberties organization
 

The COVID-19 pandemic spread more than just viral infection, with trends in surveillance presenting new concerns about personal data risk and other potential abuses, according to a new report by the International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO).

As summarized in a post from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), a member organization of INCLO, “Under Surveillance: (Mis)Use of Technology in Emergency Responses” outlines five overarching trends in surveillance during the pandemic, and attendant concerns about misuse of the technologies in question.

Personal data collection became part of the effort to neutralize COVID-19, with private tech organizations playing an outsized role in many processes. “During the pandemic companies cooperated with governments to develop contact-tracing apps and tools and engaged in data-sharing agreements that were often murky,” says the CCLA. INCLO also expressed concern about what it means for democratic oversight when companies such as Apple and Google are large enough to dictate protocols in responding to a global public health crisis.

Furthermore, said INCLO, existing technologies that were repurposed on the fly may not have had the necessary oversight. And in general, the period saw an increased normalization and entrenchment of mass biometric surveillance as a part of life.

“We have good reason to fear the possibility of mission creep, as we have already seen some governments announce their intention to use data collected during the pandemic for secondary purposes,” the CCLA summarizes. “The use of data originally collected in exceptional circumstances for non-emergency purposes violates the principle of purpose limitation and contributes to the normalization of a surveillance state that accumulates large amounts of data about people in a way that is disproportionate to its necessity and intrusiveness.”

In other words, a biometric scan for COVID-19 purposes could be reused, for something else, without appropriate consent.

In response to the findings, which surveyed surveillance measured in 15 of its member countries, INCLO called for more transparency and safeguards around extraordinary data collection during future public emergencies.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

One app, two app, three app, four: DECTA study shows users have ‘wallet fatigue’

While some see the concept of a “15-minute city” as sinister, advocates say they just don’t want to go very…

 

Stop ghost students stealing college financial aid with biometric liveness

The Associated Press recently documented a vast and fast-growing fraud on the U.S. education system in which scammers use AI…

 

Russia launching digital ID ‘super-app’ inspired by Chinese WeChat

Russia is introducing a new digital identity “super-app” that will combine messaging, government and private services, e-signatures and digital IDs….

 

Biometric Update Podcast races into the future with 1Password and agentic AI

Where do identity verification and Formula 1 racing cross paths? Jeff Shiner, CEO of 1Password, has the answers. At an…

 

With SB 260, Utah looks to change the rules around who defines identity

A new bill in Utah provides a good illustration of how “identity” is still an evolving concept. State Bill 260:…

 

Live facial recognition helps police nab sex offenders: Scottish biometrics commissioner

Live facial recognition (LFR) for police: aye or nae? Opinions in Scotland differ, as Police Scotland considers deploying the biometric…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events