FB pixel

Mistake on threshold for facial age estimation costs OnlyFans parent $1.4M

Yoti provides the tech, but does not set the threshold
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Mistake on threshold for facial age estimation costs OnlyFans parent $1.4M
 

OnlyFans parent Fenix International Limited has been fined 1.05 million pounds (approximately US$1.36 million) by a UK regulator for failing to provide accurate information about its age assurance measures. Specifically, Ofcom asked how OnlyFans’ age checks were implemented, and how effective the facial age estimation it uses is.

Yoti provides facial age estimation for OnlyFans.

The request from Ofcom was part of an information gathering exercise, according to the fine announcement, and Fenix responded that it set a challenge threshold at 23 years of age. Any user estimated to be that age or younger based on their face biometrics is required to use a secondary method for age verification.

Fenix had set OnlyFans challenge age, it turns out, at 20 years old. A correction to 23 years old was carried out on January 16, and then Fenix changed it again three days later, to 21 years old, Ofcom says.

Ofcom launched an investigation after being notified of the discrepancy. The investigation found that Fenix had failed to meet its compliance obligations, and Ofcom expressed concern with the 16 months it took the company to discover that the information it had provided was incorrect.

The fine includes a 30 percent discount for the resources saved by Fenix accepting the findings.

“OnlyFans uses Yoti facial age estimation technology to help ensure age-appropriate experiences and keep minors off their platform,” Yoti Chief Policy and Regulatory Officer Julie Dawson told Biometric Update in an emailed statement.

“The issue reported today relates to OnlyFans inadvertently reporting to Ofcom that they had set a threshold of 23 years when they had actually set it at 20 years.

“OnlyFans has always proactively elected to set the threshold for Yoti above 18 years old. The threshold is always set by the business, rather than by Yoti, as it is always the responsibility of each business to set an appropriate threshold either in compliance with regulatory requirements or to meet their internal operating policies.”

The fine is the first million-pound penalty under the Online Safety Act, which reached its enforcement deadline on March 17.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events