FB pixel

Mistake on threshold for facial age estimation costs OnlyFans parent $1.4M

Yoti provides the tech, but does not set the threshold
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Mistake on threshold for facial age estimation costs OnlyFans parent $1.4M
 

OnlyFans parent Fenix International Limited has been fined 1.05 million pounds (approximately US$1.36 million) by a UK regulator for failing to provide accurate information about its age assurance measures. Specifically, Ofcom asked how OnlyFans’ age checks were implemented, and how effective the facial age estimation it uses is.

Yoti provides facial age estimation for OnlyFans.

The request from Ofcom was part of an information gathering exercise, according to the fine announcement, and Fenix responded that it set a challenge threshold at 23 years of age. Any user estimated to be that age or younger based on their face biometrics is required to use a secondary method for age verification.

Fenix had set OnlyFans challenge age, it turns out, at 20 years old. A correction to 23 years old was carried out on January 16, and then Fenix changed it again three days later, to 21 years old, Ofcom says.

Ofcom launched an investigation after being notified of the discrepancy. The investigation found that Fenix had failed to meet its compliance obligations, and Ofcom expressed concern with the 16 months it took the company to discover that the information it had provided was incorrect.

The fine includes a 30 percent discount for the resources saved by Fenix accepting the findings.

“OnlyFans uses Yoti facial age estimation technology to help ensure age-appropriate experiences and keep minors off their platform,” Yoti Chief Policy and Regulatory Officer Julie Dawson told Biometric Update in an emailed statement.

“The issue reported today relates to OnlyFans inadvertently reporting to Ofcom that they had set a threshold of 23 years when they had actually set it at 20 years.

“OnlyFans has always proactively elected to set the threshold for Yoti above 18 years old. The threshold is always set by the business, rather than by Yoti, as it is always the responsibility of each business to set an appropriate threshold either in compliance with regulatory requirements or to meet their internal operating policies.”

The fine is the first million-pound penalty under the Online Safety Act, which reached its enforcement deadline on March 17.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Five vendors clear iBeta PAD Level 2 as biometric security benchmark rises

TWYN T4ISB, Suprema, PIPO Resource, Legitimuz and ZOLOZ have recently completed iBeta Level 2 Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) evaluations, with…

 

South Africa advances broader digital identity and public services ecosystem

South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs has launched a new portal that seeks to further ease access to Smart ID…

 

Pakistan’s NADRA rolls out homegrown QR-based ID cards

Pakistan’s National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) is transforming itself into a digital trust guarantor through homegrown innovation as it…

 

The death of the pixel: Why cryptographic provenance is the next identity frontier

By Udi Abram, VP of Corporate Affairs, AU10TIX For years, digital identity verification rested on a straightforward assumption: if a…

 

Meta smart glasses patent reignites facial recognition debate

Meta’s latest smart glasses patent offers a glimpse of a future in which cameras do more than record what their…

 

From verifying humans to AI agents: Socure prepares for the next identity challenge

Fraud has evolved alongside digital identity, from stolen credentials and account takeover to synthetic identities, deepfakes and AI-generated documents. Identity…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events