FB pixel

Canada’s AI minister considering age assurance requirements for chatbots

Concerns about chatbot psychosis mean age checks for LLMs could end up in S209
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Canada’s AI minister considering age assurance requirements for chatbots
 

Canada is considering putting digital age check requirements on large language model (LLM) chatbots.

According to the Canadian Press, the government has faced questions from people with concerns about how young people are using chatbots like ChatGPT. As OpenAI, X, Google and other firms have launched so-called AI chatbots and the tech has become common in the workplace and classroom, persistent concerns about what that means for learning have been joined by worries about whether chatbots contribute to mental health problems, including delusions.

Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon – who recently spoke at the same AI conference as the California mother who is suing OpenAI, claiming ChatGPT encouraged her son’s suicide – says his department is looking at how age assurance technology could fit into the Canadian government’s legislative strategy on chatbots.

Solomon (a former journalist who was fired when it was discovered he was brokering art deals for Mark Carney, Canada’s current prime minister) has been bullish on AI, pursuing a “wide-ranging regulatory approach.” But as concerns rise, so does urgency, and Solomon could find himself pressured to adopt a more proactive stance.

In addition to the chatbot question, the minister is said to be considering whether to inscribe the right to delete deepfakes into the government’s online safety legislation, Bill S-209, “an Act to restrict young persons’ online access to pornographic material.”

Solomon’s office is conducting a public consultation on online safety laws, and he says  6500 Canadians have already weighed in.

In the latest episode of his podcast, privacy commentator and age verification critic Michael Geist unpacks his recent appearance before Canada’s Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, wherein he presents his objections to S209, calling it a “modest improvement” on its predecessor, S210, that nonetheless retains its core flaws.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

ID4Africa 2026 shifts focus to digital identity ecosystems and sustainability

ID4Africa’s 2026 AGM opened in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire with the arrival of over a thousand delegates and participants at the…

 

Building digital ID systems that last: African countries share experiences as ID4Africa 2026 opens

It is no longer enough to just build national digital ID systems. It is critical to ensure that the systems…

 

Private sector age verification providers aren’t dying – but they do have to change

To date, government age assurance solutions have prompted lively discussion about whether or not they pose a threat to age…

 

ICE contract secures nationwide access to private iris biometric database

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is moving to give its Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) agents nationwide access to…

 

From identity to intent: Reimagining biometrics for real-time fraud prevention

By Lenny Gusel, Head of Fraud Solutions (North America), Feedzai As instant payments and open banking accelerate transaction speed and…

 

Global ID, Idiap partner to scale finger vein biometrics with machine learning

Swiss startup Global ID has announced that it has launched a new project with the Idiap Research Institute that aims…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events