FB pixel

Canada’s AI minister considering age assurance requirements for chatbots

Concerns about chatbot psychosis mean age checks for LLMs could end up in S209
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Canada’s AI minister considering age assurance requirements for chatbots
 

Canada is considering putting digital age check requirements on large language model (LLM) chatbots.

According to the Canadian Press, the government has faced questions from people with concerns about how young people are using chatbots like ChatGPT. As OpenAI, X, Google and other firms have launched so-called AI chatbots and the tech has become common in the workplace and classroom, persistent concerns about what that means for learning have been joined by worries about whether chatbots contribute to mental health problems, including delusions.

Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon – who recently spoke at the same AI conference as the California mother who is suing OpenAI, claiming ChatGPT encouraged her son’s suicide – says his department is looking at how age assurance technology could fit into the Canadian government’s legislative strategy on chatbots.

Solomon (a former journalist who was fired when it was discovered he was brokering art deals for Mark Carney, Canada’s current prime minister) has been bullish on AI, pursuing a “wide-ranging regulatory approach.” But as concerns rise, so does urgency, and Solomon could find himself pressured to adopt a more proactive stance.

In addition to the chatbot question, the minister is said to be considering whether to inscribe the right to delete deepfakes into the government’s online safety legislation, Bill S-209, “an Act to restrict young persons’ online access to pornographic material.”

Solomon’s office is conducting a public consultation on online safety laws, and he says  6500 Canadians have already weighed in.

In the latest episode of his podcast, privacy commentator and age verification critic Michael Geist unpacks his recent appearance before Canada’s Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, wherein he presents his objections to S209, calling it a “modest improvement” on its predecessor, S210, that nonetheless retains its core flaws.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Broad biometrics adoption in new and established markets spurs investor action

The growth of biometrics in emerging industries like age verification and established ones like payments is dovetailing with the adoption…

 

Can facial age estimation save Roblox from more lawsuits?

Come January, if you want to chat in Roblox, you’ll need to let digital identity firm Persona estimate your age….

 

How commercial surveillance tools became essential to FBI investigations

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has come to rely on Clearview AI, Babel Street, and ZeroFox to support its…

 

Alaska seeks major AI overhaul of state services through myAlaska mobile app

Alaska is exploring a sweeping redesign of its statewide digital services platform, issuing a Request for Information (RFI) that signals…

 

No pints with digital ID or porn from Belize for UK revelers this Christmas

UK drinkers raising a glass to former Technology Secretary Peter Kyle this Christmas would best honour him with a glass…

 

African digital ID systems need better governance by stronger independent bodies: Researchers

Digital ID systems backed by biometrics are being imposed on Africans, preventing millions from receiving essential services they are entitled…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events