FB pixel

California DNA collection law to be reviewed by Federal Appeals Court


The California Law that requires all arrested felons, regardless of whether they were convicted or not, to submit their biometric data including DNA samples will be reviewed by the Federal Appeals court. A panel composed of three judges upheld the law initially, but now the law will be reviewed by a separate group composed of 11 Federal Court judges.

The U.S. 9th Circuit court of Appeals will review the split decision made by the three judges allowing the implements of the law in February. This review will be a major setback for state prosecutor’s advocating the use of the law. They argue that DNA collection is a vital tool in fighting crime and in properly identifying criminals within the system. The California law requires that a person arrested by law enforcement agencies in the state will be swabbed and their DNA samples will be entered into a criminal database where it will be stored and then compared to other samples collected from crime scenes.

One reason for the Federal Court review is the protest filed by three persons who were arrested but never convicted. Among the three complainants, two of them were released without charges being filed but the DNA samples were already obtained by the state. Arguments over the law and violation of constitutional rights have risen as it essentially protects a person from unlawful search and seizures.

People who were not convicted but had their DNA collected could apply to have their samples removed from the database. However, to have their records expunged is a long process and often, uncertain and fairly expensive. Also, they will be asked to submit the same samples in the event of a subsequent arrest.

Is DNA sampling crucial in the war against crime?

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


Biometrics deployments expand protection against fraud and lying about your age

Biometrics are protecting against false claims of all sorts in several of the most-read articles of the past week on…


UN says law enforcement should not use biometrics to surveil protestors

Law enforcement agencies should not use biometric technology to categorize, profile or remotely identify individuals during protests, the United Nations…


How to explain the EUDI Wallet? Industry and citizens discuss Europe’s digital ID

The European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet is well on its way towards becoming a reality. To explain the major impact…


Decentralize face authentication for control, stronger protection: Youverse

The implementation method of biometric face authentication has become increasingly important in recent years due to the limitations of traditional…


Researchers develop display screens with biometric sensor capabilities

Traditional display screens like those built into smartphones require extra sensors for touch control, ambient light, and fingerprint sensing. These…


Meta, porn industry and Kansas governor weigh in on age verification

As Europe mulls how to restrict access to certain content for minors, Meta offers its own solution. Meanwhile, U.S. states…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events