FB pixel

Guidelines for UK police chiefs on applications to retain & use biometric material

 

The UK’s National DNA Database Strategy Board has published guidelines for chief police officers when deciding whether to make an application to the biometrics commissioner for the retention and use of biometric material.

Falling under section 63G of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the guidelines are intended to protect the rights of innocent UK citizens arrested in the course of an investigation, particularly in relation to their DNA profiles or fingerprints.

According to the eight-page “Applications to the Biometrics Commissioner under PACE” document, the previous legislation allowed police to retain indefinitely DNA profiles and fingerprints taken from people who were arrested but never charged with any offense.

The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) updated this law, ensuring that law enforcement no longer have the power to retain DNA profiles or fingerprints in these situations.

In an effort to protect the rights of innocent UK citizens arrested in the course of an investigation, their DNA profiles and fingerprints are now typically deleted after a ruling has been made on the person not being charged so long as they have no prior convictions that would warrant the retention of their profile.

However, people with no prior convictions who are arrested for a crime but not charged, and then later commit further offenses, may remain unidentified as a result of their biometric data no longer being in the national database. This would obviously affect the police’s ability to prevent and detect crime in the future.

To resolve this issue, the PoFA has introduced a new rule in special cases where chief officers of police can apply for the DNA profile and/or fingerprints taken from a person arrested but not charged with an offence to be kept for three years from the date the biometric data was collected or from the date of arrest, if no biometric data was taken on arrest.

Such applications are made under section 63G of PACE to biometric commissioner Alastair R MacGregor QC, who acts as an independent authority of the UK government in reviewing the retention and use by the police of DNA samples, DNA profiles and fingerprints.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ring and Flock call off integration as scrutiny of camera-to-police partnership intensifies

Amazon-owned Ring and Flock Safety have canceled their planned partnership, stepping back from an integration that would have linked one…

 

MOSIP pursues democratization of digital identity with unconference conversations

A democratic vision of digital identity is central to the non-profit, open-source mandate of MOSIP. As the organization and the…

 

Liveness is king: FaceTec’s Jay Meier in conversation with Chris Burt 

It’s best, says Jay Meier, to think about identity management as a system of symbiotic systems. Which is to say,…

 

Ofcom fines Kick, threatens 4chan as OSA enforcement steadily dials up

UK regulator Ofcom has faced criticism for being too slow and lenient with its power to enforce the Online Safety…

 

Innovatrics, ROC improve rankings in NIST ELFT, rising to 2 and 3 respectively

Innovatrics is celebrating success in the latest National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies (ELFT)…

 

Meta plans launch of facial recognition to smart glasses in ‘dynamic political environment’

Meta is reportedly planning to roll out facial recognition capabilities for its smart glasses as early as this year, taking…

Comments

19 Replies to “Guidelines for UK police chiefs on applications to retain & use biometric material”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events