FB pixel

Human Rights Watch raises privacy concerns over Chinese voice recognition program

 

China’s government is collecting “voice pattern” samples from its citizens to build a database for use with voice recognition technology, Human Rights Watch (HRW) announced in a fascinating article published Sunday.

In collaboration with Chinese company iFlytek, which HRW says makes 80 percent of the country’s speech recognition technology, China’s Ministry of Public Security is working on a pilot project to identify the voices of targeted individuals in telephone conversations.

“The Chinese government has been collecting the voice patterns of tens of thousands of people with little transparency about the program or laws regulating who can be targeted or how that information is going to be used,” said Sophie Richardson, HRW China director.

The government’s voice pattern database is small compared to its other biometric databases, according to HRW. Police had collected roughly 70,000 samples from one of the provinces in the pilot program by 2015, while authorities’ facial image database contains more than a billion individuals, and its DNA database includes some 40 million samples.

Chinese media has reported that an artificial intelligence technology called Automatic Speaker Recognition (ASR) has been used by law enforcement, and that it will be used for counterterrorism and “stability maintenance,” which HRW says indicates “the suppression of peaceful dissent.” The article details the roll-out of the voice pattern database, starting in 2012, and expanding to six provinces by 2016, including the restive Xinjiang province, where police are reported to have biometric collection quotas.

Biometric data collection and wiretapping are limited under Chinese law, though draft legislation would expand the legal conditions for biometrics collection, HRW reports. The rights group urges the Chinese authorities to review the relevant laws and procedures to ensure they are consistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which the country has signed, but not ratified. It also urges companies involved to limit the use of collected data to the purpose consent was given for, and to test their systems’ accuracy transparently, according to industry standards.

The full article is available from Human Rights Watch.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Asian banks deploy biometrics and digital ID for security, additional services

As digital identity gains prominence in a financial industry beset by fraud, nations in Asia are enabling banks to lead…

 

Mobile ID combats fraud, gives holder control of personal data: USPF report

The U.S. Payments Forum (USPF) has published a new white paper entitled “The Role of Mobile IDs in Payments.” Authored…

 

Wyoming plots mobile driver’s license launch for 2025

Wyoming is moving towards the issuance of digital ID in the form of an optional mobile driver’s license, but it…

 

EU publishes rollout schedule for AI Act

The European Union has published the final text of the Artificial Intelligence Act, outlining the most important deadlines for complying…

 

World Bank identifies priority actions for DPI in Equatorial Guinea

A World Bank team has identified immediate actions which the government of Equatorial Guinea should undertake in ramping up its…

 

Some sort of ID could be ‘inevitable’ for UK: lawmakers

The UK is still debating national identity documents and digital identities, with lawmakers and experts arguing that the creation of…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events