FB pixel

Human Rights Watch raises privacy concerns over Chinese voice recognition program

 

China’s government is collecting “voice pattern” samples from its citizens to build a database for use with voice recognition technology, Human Rights Watch (HRW) announced in a fascinating article published Sunday.

In collaboration with Chinese company iFlytek, which HRW says makes 80 percent of the country’s speech recognition technology, China’s Ministry of Public Security is working on a pilot project to identify the voices of targeted individuals in telephone conversations.

“The Chinese government has been collecting the voice patterns of tens of thousands of people with little transparency about the program or laws regulating who can be targeted or how that information is going to be used,” said Sophie Richardson, HRW China director.

The government’s voice pattern database is small compared to its other biometric databases, according to HRW. Police had collected roughly 70,000 samples from one of the provinces in the pilot program by 2015, while authorities’ facial image database contains more than a billion individuals, and its DNA database includes some 40 million samples.

Chinese media has reported that an artificial intelligence technology called Automatic Speaker Recognition (ASR) has been used by law enforcement, and that it will be used for counterterrorism and “stability maintenance,” which HRW says indicates “the suppression of peaceful dissent.” The article details the roll-out of the voice pattern database, starting in 2012, and expanding to six provinces by 2016, including the restive Xinjiang province, where police are reported to have biometric collection quotas.

Biometric data collection and wiretapping are limited under Chinese law, though draft legislation would expand the legal conditions for biometrics collection, HRW reports. The rights group urges the Chinese authorities to review the relevant laws and procedures to ensure they are consistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which the country has signed, but not ratified. It also urges companies involved to limit the use of collected data to the purpose consent was given for, and to test their systems’ accuracy transparently, according to industry standards.

The full article is available from Human Rights Watch.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ring and Flock call off integration as scrutiny of camera-to-police partnership intensifies

Amazon-owned Ring and Flock Safety have canceled their planned partnership, stepping back from an integration that would have linked one…

 

MOSIP pursues democratization of digital identity with unconference conversations

A democratic vision of digital identity is central to the non-profit, open-source mandate of MOSIP. As the organization and the…

 

Liveness is king: FaceTec’s Jay Meier in conversation with Chris Burt 

It’s best, says Jay Meier, to think about identity management as a system of symbiotic systems. Which is to say,…

 

Ofcom fines Kick, threatens 4chan as OSA enforcement steadily dials up

UK regulator Ofcom has faced criticism for being too slow and lenient with its power to enforce the Online Safety…

 

Innovatrics, ROC improve rankings in NIST ELFT, rising to 2 and 3 respectively

Innovatrics is celebrating success in the latest National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies (ELFT)…

 

Meta plans launch of facial recognition to smart glasses in ‘dynamic political environment’

Meta is reportedly planning to roll out facial recognition capabilities for its smart glasses as early as this year, taking…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events