FB pixel

CBP does not have data to assess racial bias in Biometric Exit facial recognition

 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection does not gather data on race and ethnicity, and therefore is not able to assess any potential bias in its biometric facial recognition algorithms without relying on reports from the Department of Homeland Security’s Redress program, an agency representative told an audience at the International Association of Privacy Professionals Summit, CNet reports.

CBP Privacy Officer Debra Danisek says the agency collects data from passports, such as age, gender, and citizenship, but does not have the information it would need to know when a mismatch is based on the subject’s skin color.

“In terms of, ‘Does this technology have a different impact on different racial groups?,’ we don’t collect that sort of data,” Danisek said. “In terms of keeping metrics on which groups are more affected, we wouldn’t have those metrics to begin with.” She said CBP would investigate if a pattern of complaints about the process was detected.

An audit report from the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General found only 85 percent of passengers were confirmed with biometrics, though the technology has also been successful in matching 98 percent of passengers in demonstrations.

Constitution Project Senior Counsel Jake Laperruque expressed concern about CBPs approach to the issue in an email to CNet.

“The comments reflect a troubling lack of concern about well-documented problem of facial recognition systems having higher error rates for people of color,” he says. “CBP can’t simply ignore a serious issue and take a ‘see no evil approach’ — if they’re not willing to confront serious civil rights problems and deal with them, they shouldn’t be trusted to operate a program like this.”

Georgetown University’s Center on Privacy and Technology suggested racial bias could be a problem for the Biometric Entry/Exit system over a year ago.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biden executive order prioritizes privacy-preserving digital ID, mDLs

In one of his last official acts as President, Joe Biden on Thursday issued a robust new executive order (EO)…

 

Problem with police use of facial recognition isn’t with the biometrics

A major investigation by the Washington Post has revealed that police in the U.S. regularly use facial recognition as the…

 

Sri Lanka considers another tender to solve passport crisis

Sri Lanka’s government is likely to open another tender for e-passports after a legal dispute caused a backlog of thousands…

 

Age assurance gets warm early response from U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court appears to be leaning toward support for Texas’ age assurance law, as it weighs a host…

 

State of passkeys 2025: passkeys move to mainstream

More than 1 billion people have activated at least one passkey according to the FIDO Alliance – an astonishing number…

 

Ofcom publishes highly anticipated age assurance statement

Ofcom has published its Age Assurance and Children’s Access Statement. The much-anticipated statement includes guidance on “highly effective age assurance”…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events