FB pixel

State law proposed in Michigan Senate to ban use of facial biometrics by law enforcement

 

The Michigan Senate is considering a bill which would ban the use of biometric facial recognition by law enforcement in the state, according to The Libertarian Institute.

SB342 was introduced by Sen. Peter Lucido (R), which would impose a broad ban on law enforcement officials obtaining, accessing, or using facial recognition technology, or any information gathered with the technology. The bill defines any such use as a violation of the Fourth Amendment, as well as section 11 or Article I of the state constitution.

The bill may be a response to the recent budget proposal by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, which includes $562,500 for improvements to the search capabilities of the State Police’s facial recognition system, as reported by GovTech. MSP’s Statewide Network of Agency Photos (SNAP) holds nearly 50 million facial images, including all driver’s license images collected by the Secretary of State’s Office. There are approximately 8 million adults in Michigan.

The Michigan chapter of the ACLU says that people should be concerned about the database, and a spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s Office said notice procedures for data sharing are being considered. An MSP spokesperson said that facial recognition is never used to positively identify a suspect, and that the new funds would be used to upgrade the six-year-old algorithm for better speed and accuracy.

The Libertarian Institute says federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies are working together to build a national facial recognition system, and notes that the FBI rolled out its national facial recognition program in 2014. The report also points out that federal grant money is often used by local law enforcement agencies to purchase surveillance equipment, including ALPRs, stingrays, and drones, and also encourages information sharing through its fusion centers and Information Sharing Environment (ISE).

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety for approval.

Industry groups have slammed San Francisco’s decision to ban most facial recognition use by law enforcement and government agencies in the city, and a proposed law to require notice of the use of public facial recognition in Washington State failed to reach a vote in the lower state house by the deadline last month.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics adoption strategies benefit when government direction is clear

Biometrics providers have major growth opportunities ahead where there is clarity about their role. What part governments play in digital…

 

Biometric Update Podcast digs into deepfakes with Pindrop CEO

Deepfakes are one of the biggest issues of our age. But while video deepfakes get the most attention, audio deepfakes…

 

Know your geography for successful digital ID adoption: Trinsic

A big year for digital identity issuance, adoption and regulation has widened the opportunities for businesses around the world to…

 

UK’s digital ID trust problem now between business and government

It used to be that the UK public’s trust in the government was a barrier to the establishment of a…

 

Super-recognizers can’t help with deepfakes, but deepfakes can help with algorithms

Deepfake faces are beyond even the ability of super-recognizers to identify consistently, with some sobering implications, but also a few…

 

Age assurance regulations push sites to weigh risks and explore options for compliance

Online age assurance laws have taken effect in certain jurisdictions, prompting platforms to look carefully at what they’re liable for…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events