FB pixel

Proposed AI and biometrics restrictions by EU draw mixed, muted reaction

 

biometric identification facial recognition

Reaction is rolling in to the European Union’s attempt to coral artificial intelligence with regulation, which includes strict new proposed rules for the use of biometrics in public spaces by law enforcement.

The rules aim for a middle path between China and the U.S., in terms of government involvement, the Financial Times writes. Columbia University EU Law Professor Anu Bradford describes the new rules as an attempt to re-establish competitiveness in AI without compromising on human rights

The use of biometrics and predictive algorithms at borders is still allowed, if the right regulatory hoops for ‘high-risk’ AI are jumped through, the Times reports.

Representatives from European Digital Rights criticized the rules for not providing enough recourse mechanisms for individuals adversely affected by AI.

The role of trust is placed at the center of the EU’s bet, however, Bradford says, as AI systems seen as trustworthy could have an advantage in the broader market.

“It’s going to make it prohibitively expensive or even technologically infeasible to build AI in Europe,” Center for Data Innovation Senior Policy Analyst Benjamin Mueller told the Wall Street Journal. “The U.S. and China are going to look on with amusement as the EU kneecaps its own startups.”

Some lobbyists told the Journal they were relieved at the proposal, however.

Diginimica points out that the European Commission rules fit most AI applications into the ‘minimal risk’ category, just below chatbots and other ‘limited risk’ uses. Remote biometric systems get even stricter treatment than other ‘high-risk’ systems, though they are not doomed to the ‘unacceptable risk’ category.

The publication rightly points out that competing estimates of compliance costs will soon be presented as arguments for and against the EC’s proposal. Further, the risk categories may be too vague for regulators with little understanding of the technology to work with.

European regulations like GDPR have influenced regulations passed since in other jurisdictions, however, as a lawyer interviewed by Wired notes. The Observer, however, points out that only one of 13 bills and resolutions on AI made it through state legislatures last year.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics providers and credentials level up with new capabilities

Biometrics is a fast-evolving field about persistence, so new versions of major digital identity providers and biometric technology companies naturally…

 

Alan Goode offers insights on booming transitional IDV market on BU Podcast

Technology is transforming identity verification. According to Alan Goode of Goode Intelligence, by 2030, digital identity verification will pass traditional…

 

Share less data in more places: inching towards decentralized digital ID for travel

The travel industry is slowly shifting to a more decentralized model of digital identity. This was one of the key…

 

Clearview takes fresh legal hits over Canada class action, UK fine

Few biometrics companies have taken a bigger regulatory and legal beating than Clearview AI. It has already been a rough…

 

Mexico makes biometric identifier mandatory for all citizens

Mexico has officially introduced a digital identification system by signing a law that turned the previously optional biometric-based citizen code…

 

MOSIP highlights the UN DPI Safeguards Initiative

The United Nations’ DPI Safeguards Initiative has released 259 recommendations designed to guide regulators, advocates, donors, technology providers and governments…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events