FB pixel

AI industry deprioritizes ethics for profits through 2030, says large panel of experts

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News
 

biometric digital identity verification for fraud prevention

Talk of giving the AI industry an ethical core is pretty much just that, according to a new Pew Research canvass of industry insiders.

Sixty-eight percent of the 602 survey respondents said that “ethical principles focused primarily on the public good will not be employed in most AI systems by 2030″ (Pew’s emphasis).

That is a dire thought for those concerned about the biometric matches and decisions being made for humans by algorithms, and for those hoping to keep government regulation to a minimum.

A growing number of experts in and outside the industry feel that, globally, people will reject AI unless they trust it. Building the many fundamental aspects of ethics into AI is the only way — short of forcing it on populations — to make the algorithms commonplace.

It is important to note that Pew, which worked on the survey with Elon University, described the result as a non-scientific canvassing of selected people. It only reflects the views of people known to the organizations who were surveyed.

Participants were businesspeople, policymakers, software developers, activists and researchers.

The stakes go beyond biases, although biases are top-tier concerns. Pew researchers said there is a growing impression that “AI will affect what it means to be human, to be productive and to exercise free will.”

Respondents found room for optimism in AI’s further development.

For one thing, according to the report, “No technology endures if it broadly delivers unfair or unwanted outcomes.”

Advances will add positively to humanity, according to some survey takers. The Pew report focuses largely on beneficial roles AI might play in medicine, diagnosis, treatment and health care generally.

And the industry is not precisely running from ethical practices, development and operations. The survey picked up the sentiment that “market and legal systems will drive out the worst AI systems,” although it would appear that that largely will not happen during the next eight years.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ghost Murmur whispers the arrival of zoemetrics

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner There are two things about biometrics that make it an…

 

White House fraud crackdown sharpens focus on digital identity

The Trump administration’s March 6 Executive Order 14390, aimed at combating cybercrime and fraud, has prompted a significant response from…

 

Gender gaps threaten progress on global legal identity goals, Vital Strategies CEO warns

As countries work toward universal legal identity under SDG 16.9, greater focus on gender inclusion is needed to ensure women and…

 

Guyana data chief says digital ID won’t replace voter ID

Guyana’s Data Protection Commissioner, Aneal Giddings, has clarified that the country’s national digital ID is not intended to be used…

 

Biometrics at scale: EES setbacks meet growth push

The effectiveness of biometrics deployments at scale can be prone to failures of procedure or coordination, as travelers to Europe…

 

Concordium’s Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki wants to keep your AI agents in line

“Without identity, autonomous action is just autonomous risk.” So says Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki, CEO of Layer-1 blockchain protocol Concordium. Concordium has…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events