FB pixel

Six Flags and Snapchat parent head off court decisions in biometric privacy suits

Opt for $36M settlement, arbitration respectively
Six Flags and Snapchat parent head off court decisions in biometric privacy suits
 

A settlement has been reached in the biometric data privacy lawsuit against Six Flags for $36 million, the Cook County Record reports,

Payouts for plaintiffs could total up to $200 for those with their fingerprints scanned before 2016, and $60 for those scanned from 2016 to 2018, according to the Record, which according to settlement documents would be paid out in installments over a five-year period. Plaintiffs’ representatives will ask the court to allow them to claim one-third of the total, $12 million, in fees. The theme park began providing disclosure of its fingerprinting practices in 2016.

The case forced an interpretation of standing under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) in the State’s Supreme Court, which opened the floodgates for suits in which the biometric data in question was never breached, illegally shared or sold, and absent personal injury as defined by previous statutes in state and federal law.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the case was sent back to Lake County, where the settlement has been filed.

Snapchat sent to arbitration

A biometric data privacy lawsuit against Snapchat parent Snap has been sent to arbitration by a judge with the Southern District of Illinois, Law Street writes.

A 2019 complaint against the social media network alleges the use of face biometrics on a 13-year old plaintiff, whose motion in opposition to the arbitration request argued the delegation provision included in the arbitration agreement of the app’s terms of service was insufficient. The court sided with Snap, ruling that the American Arbitration Association’s Consumer Arbitration Rules are invoked in the terms as governing any arbitration attempts.

The plaintiff then argues that the terms were generally unenforceable, and the court referred to its previous finding, which puts the decision with the arbitrator.

Amazon recently decided to stop pushing for its BIPA case to be arbitrated, and will instead opt for an all-or-nothing court victory, assuming it does not change course and settle in the meantime, like Six Flags.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events