FB pixel

UK advocate for biometric surveillance says new code of practice pulls punches

UK advocate for biometric surveillance says new code of practice pulls punches
 

“Remarkably lightweight” is how a former United Kingdom surveillance commissioner describes proposed changes to national police policy covering facial recognition systems.

Tony Porter, who had been the Home Office’s surveillance camera commissioner, writing in Policing Insight, said stronger guidance and clearer governance is needed in a draft code about how law enforcement uses cameras and the data they harvest.

Porter today is chief privacy officer of facial recognition systems vendor Corsight AI. He said regulation of the systems should come from the government’s Investigatory Powers Commissioner.

Porter said he sees evidence that the best facial recognition algorithms are “rapidly diminishing” age, race and ethnicity biases observable eight years ago when the code was written. He said these top systems surpass a human’s ability to identify people, even if they are wearing a mask.

Yet, his post pins the new surveillance draft against the wall when, for example, it lists things “police chiefs” must ensure.

They need to explain why a given category of people are to be put on watch lists, first. They also must identify the criteria that goes into determining when and where they want to deploy live face biometrics surveillance. Also, law enforcement has to have an authorization process and criteria for those deployments.

Particularly in light of a recent court ruling (Bridges v. South Wales Police) that was critical of police use of facial recognition surveillance systems, Porter pronounced the list lightweight.

“Strong governance, streamlined oversight and an independently overseen code is the absolute minimum” needed to win and keep public trust, he writes. Meaningful safeguards can create an environment in which police can be trusted to use face biometrics to protect citizens fairly, uniformly and effectively.

Porter has been joined by researchers at the Ada Lovelace Institute in saying the draft needs more muscular regulation.

The current Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner, Fraser Sampson, has launched a consultation process and is inviting comment “from a wide range of stakeholders.” The consultation period closes September 8, and Sampson intends to table the draft code in parliament in late autumn.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

EUDI What? As wallet deadline looms, awareness remains low

New consumer research from IDnow shows that only about half of French and German customers have heard of the European…

 

The surveillance networks cities do not have to buy

Private camera networks are beginning to emerge in cities across the U.S. which operate outside the boundaries of companies who…

 

German lawmakers approve live facial recognition use by federal police

Germany’s Federal Police appear on track to get new powers in a broad update of their governing rules, including a…

 

Kantara updates digital identity certification criteria for latest NIST revision

The Kantara Initiative has expanded its certification program for NIST’s Digital Identity Guidelines by releasing new criteria for their latest…

 

Ofcom launches investigation into TikTok over ‘age inference’ system

UK regulator Ofcom has opened an investigation to determine whether social media platform TikTok is in violation of the Online…

 

ROC sweeps Class B in NIST’s latent biometric accuracy assessment

ROC is making the case for U.S. domestic fingerprint biometrics at scale to be powered by algorithms developed in America,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events