FB pixel

UK advocate for biometric surveillance says new code of practice pulls punches

UK advocate for biometric surveillance says new code of practice pulls punches
 

“Remarkably lightweight” is how a former United Kingdom surveillance commissioner describes proposed changes to national police policy covering facial recognition systems.

Tony Porter, who had been the Home Office’s surveillance camera commissioner, writing in Policing Insight, said stronger guidance and clearer governance is needed in a draft code about how law enforcement uses cameras and the data they harvest.

Porter today is chief privacy officer of facial recognition systems vendor Corsight AI. He said regulation of the systems should come from the government’s Investigatory Powers Commissioner.

Porter said he sees evidence that the best facial recognition algorithms are “rapidly diminishing” age, race and ethnicity biases observable eight years ago when the code was written. He said these top systems surpass a human’s ability to identify people, even if they are wearing a mask.

Yet, his post pins the new surveillance draft against the wall when, for example, it lists things “police chiefs” must ensure.

They need to explain why a given category of people are to be put on watch lists, first. They also must identify the criteria that goes into determining when and where they want to deploy live face biometrics surveillance. Also, law enforcement has to have an authorization process and criteria for those deployments.

Particularly in light of a recent court ruling (Bridges v. South Wales Police) that was critical of police use of facial recognition surveillance systems, Porter pronounced the list lightweight.

“Strong governance, streamlined oversight and an independently overseen code is the absolute minimum” needed to win and keep public trust, he writes. Meaningful safeguards can create an environment in which police can be trusted to use face biometrics to protect citizens fairly, uniformly and effectively.

Porter has been joined by researchers at the Ada Lovelace Institute in saying the draft needs more muscular regulation.

The current Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner, Fraser Sampson, has launched a consultation process and is inviting comment “from a wide range of stakeholders.” The consultation period closes September 8, and Sampson intends to table the draft code in parliament in late autumn.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

New research explores AI manipulation attacks on face biometric systems

A pair of new research papers address sophisticated fraud attempts on biometric systems using AI, in one case to carry…

 

As biometrics infiltrate the fan experience, will anyone challenge Wicket at the game?

In terms of biometric use cases, security, privacy and fraud prevention are all good – but what if you just…

 

US workers concerned about employers’ digital snooping: GAO

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), the research arm of the U.S. Congress, this week released a report on the…

 

ID.me and Liminal strengthen executive teams

ID.me and Liminal have made appointments to strengthen their executive leadership teams. ID.me has named Scott Meyer its new chief…

 

Socure takes IDV solutions global, available in over 190 countries

Socure has announced the expansion of its identity verification offerings, which provides coverage for all International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)-compliant…

 

Panini expands BioCred suite with new cloud-based IDV platform

Payments processing tech provider Panini is expanding its BioCred identity verification tool, with the introduction of a new cloud-based service…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events