FB pixel

A couple big wins for skeptics of government use of facial recognition

A couple big wins for skeptics of government use of facial recognition
 

In a surprise to some, elected officials in Colorado and New Orleans are telling proponents of face biometrics that personal privacy can outbalance the need by law enforcement and other government agencies to use facial recognition systems.

In Colorado, the governor has signed into law new rules restricting the use of facial recognition by agencies and state institutions of higher learning. Meanwhile, the New Orleans City Council shut down a request from the municipality’s superintendent of police to give officers access to facial recognition software.

The Colorado law, SB 113, forces leaders of the organizations described to get permission to “develop, procure, use or continue to sue facial recognition service,” according to the National Law Review.

Using its “reporting authority,” presumably to the state legislature, the agency or school must report the name of the vendor and the capacities of the system that would be used. The type of data to be collected, how it will be collected and processed as well as the purpose and benefits of the data collection must be revealed.

That is not the end of the requirements. It appears that the legislature surveyed how the many government bodies around the world have either undercut or created trust in facial recognition systems based on how they addressed transparency.

The New Orleans decision is more dramatic because city Mayor LaToya Cantrell had joined Supt. Shaun Ferguson in endorsing fewer restrictions on use of the AI software, according to regional news publisher nola.com. It is more so still because violent crime, which like all major U.S. cities New Orleans suffers, has often pushed electorates to get-tough campaigns.

In the final days of 2020, the city council banned some aspects of a surveillance system already live and banned outright facial recognition and predictive policing.

Although it had for years denied using facial recognition, the police department was forced to admit that it had been given access to the software by state and federal agencies that used it. That admission came weeks before the council’s ban.

Some opponents of facial recognition us by agencies were concerned in the last year when some governments started repealing earlier bans.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events