FB pixel

Warrant served on US suspect forcing him to unlock phone with biometric lock

Warrant served on US suspect forcing him to unlock phone with biometric lock
 

For years, the Internet has argued if police in the United States can force a suspect to open their phone with their face. Expert (and otherwise) opinion and court rulings have only further muddied things.

The issue remains unsettled, but an article on Forbes.com reports on a federal warrant dated July 13 that successfully forced a suspect to unlock an encrypted messaging app on his iPhone.

Forbes points out that the FBI, which wielded this warrant, has made owners of iPhones to unlock the devices using Face ID. This is the first such tool used in the United States to access a biometrically encrypted messaging app.

Some civil rights advocates maintain that that suspect was forced to incriminate himself by opening Wickr just the same as if he had been persuaded to give police a password (which, to date, has been held generally to be illegal self-incrimination.)

In this specific case, the FBI served the warrant on a Tennessee man suspected of trafficking in child sexual abuse material, a federal crime.

It is not known if the federal government has used this kind of search warrant to prosecute other, less visceral, crimes.

It is a topic that has been percolating for years and is unlikely to be settled until it is heard before the U.S. Supreme Court.

A year ago, a South Carolina judge asked the state attorney general how likely it is that state higher courts would approve of forced biometric compliance. The answer? Go for it.

Two years ago, New York City police handcuffed a Queens resident who had photographed officers not wearing Covid masks. They tried to hold his phone in front of his face so that it unlocked.

And in 2019, a U.S. magistrate judge ruled biometric locks are protected by the Fifth Amendment protection people from self-incrimination.

Perhaps the only thing that can be said with certainty about the situation is that no one has made it illegal to disable biometric locks before handing a phone to law enforcement.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

CBP seeks walk-through biometric facial comparison at 38 airport terminals

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is seeking a biometric capture system that can photograph Global Entry travelers while they…

 

Interoperability, adoption now critical questions facing UK digital identity effort

Like an old social media post buried deep in someone’s feed, past policy positions can be dug up to help…

 

Meta’s smart glasses privacy defense falters when AI can use camera without recording light

Meta has spent months defending its rapidly expanding line of AI glasses by pointing to a small white light. The…

 

Cyprus opens bidding for €9.8M digital ID upgrade, EUDI Wallet integration contract

Cyprus is seeking to upgrade its digital public services application and integrate the planned “Digital Citizen 2.0” with the country’s…

 

Moldova upgrades biometric capabilities for border control, law enforcement

Interpol is working with Moldova to increase its biometric border capacities, in part through two initiatives targeting border crossings by…

 

Germany unveils national EUDI wallet ‘d-you’

Berlin has taken the wraps off its official European Digital Identity (EUDI) wallet. Branded d‑you, the wallet will allow citizens…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events