FB pixel

There’s money in delivery vehicle biometric systems; not all drivers OK with surveillance

There’s money in delivery vehicle biometric systems; not all drivers OK with surveillance
 

Some professional drivers are reacting with dismay to employers who, unable to physically watch their workers from every passenger seat, install unblinking, dashboard-mounted biometric surveillance systems.

The drivers see intrusiveness, distrust and a lack of transparency, but makers of in-vehicle facial recognition systems see massive growth.

The monitors are doing all the things the industry has promised for years: watching for drowsiness, inattentiveness, risky driving; and recording eye movement. They also are recording audio from the front seat.

That sounds like money to ABI Research’s automotive industry analyst Maite Bezerra. Bezerra is predicting that orders of these increasingly sophisticated systems will generate revenue of $1 billion between now and 2027. That will be an almost 500 percent increase, Bezerra told Business Insider.

The report notes Seeing Machines, Cipia, Tobii and Jungo among driver monitoring tech suppliers.

At the moment, however, driver-facing biometrics systems are generating controversy as well.

Legal wrangles continued, for instance in a biometric data privacy suit against Microsoft brought by ex-Uber drivers.

Trade publication Motherboard has reported on a successful strike in the U.S. state of Washington by food delivery drivers.

They did not want to face a camera all day while driving for the wholesale unit of sandwich restaurant Homegrown. They allegedly also have not been told how their biometric identifiers are being used, stored or shared.

In fact, according to reporting on the same matter by The Seattle Times, some employees feel installation of hardware from Toronto-based Foresight Analytics was retribution for a unionization drive. Drivers demanded and won better vehicle maintenance, benefits and pay.

After a one-day strike over the cameras, the company reportedly agreed to let drivers put up a partition to hide their faces from biometric surveillance.

A year ago, Motherboard reported on alleged surveillance of Amazon drivers that led to sanctions for substandard behavior. That judgment has been disputed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Privacy, free speech, children’s online safety collide in age assurance legal wars

By this point, the amount of collective hand wringing over children’s online safety and related age assurance legislation could surely…

 

St. Kitts and Nevis chooses Cybernetica as strategic adviser for digital ID system

St. Kitts and Nevis has chosen Cybernetica as strategic adviser as it implements a national digital identity system. Cybernetica is…

 

UK needs unified regulation for facial recognition: Biometrics Institute

The UK needs a clearer and consistent framework for governing facial recognition in public spaces as missteps in deploying the…

 

Cambodia: IDPoor Programme alleviates poverty as system continues digitization

The United Nations Development Programme has provided additional ICT equipment for Cambodia’s IDPoor Programme. The equipment includes 546 tablets, software…

 

Growth of digital wallet use shaking up payment regulations and benefits delivery

Digital wallets are transforming online, offline and cross-border payments around the world, prompting calls for regulatory change in Australis and…

 

Sardine nets $70M in Series C funding for automated fraud prevention platform

Sardine, a startup that employs machine learning for fraud prevention, compliance and credit underwriting, has announced a $70 million Series…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events