FB pixel

There’s money in delivery vehicle biometric systems; not all drivers OK with surveillance

There’s money in delivery vehicle biometric systems; not all drivers OK with surveillance
 

Some professional drivers are reacting with dismay to employers who, unable to physically watch their workers from every passenger seat, install unblinking, dashboard-mounted biometric surveillance systems.

The drivers see intrusiveness, distrust and a lack of transparency, but makers of in-vehicle facial recognition systems see massive growth.

The monitors are doing all the things the industry has promised for years: watching for drowsiness, inattentiveness, risky driving; and recording eye movement. They also are recording audio from the front seat.

That sounds like money to ABI Research’s automotive industry analyst Maite Bezerra. Bezerra is predicting that orders of these increasingly sophisticated systems will generate revenue of $1 billion between now and 2027. That will be an almost 500 percent increase, Bezerra told Business Insider.

The report notes Seeing Machines, Cipia, Tobii and Jungo among driver monitoring tech suppliers.

At the moment, however, driver-facing biometrics systems are generating controversy as well.

Legal wrangles continued, for instance in a biometric data privacy suit against Microsoft brought by ex-Uber drivers.

Trade publication Motherboard has reported on a successful strike in the U.S. state of Washington by food delivery drivers.

They did not want to face a camera all day while driving for the wholesale unit of sandwich restaurant Homegrown. They allegedly also have not been told how their biometric identifiers are being used, stored or shared.

In fact, according to reporting on the same matter by The Seattle Times, some employees feel installation of hardware from Toronto-based Foresight Analytics was retribution for a unionization drive. Drivers demanded and won better vehicle maintenance, benefits and pay.

After a one-day strike over the cameras, the company reportedly agreed to let drivers put up a partition to hide their faces from biometric surveillance.

A year ago, Motherboard reported on alleged surveillance of Amazon drivers that led to sanctions for substandard behavior. That judgment has been disputed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

ASEAN moves toward interoperable digital identity with verifiable credentials

The 11 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are among the world’s most active adopters of digital identity….

 

DHS biometric overhaul remains tied to Thales as HART deadline passes

Eight days after DHS was supposed to bring its long-delayed HART biometric system into initial operation, the department was still…

 

TikTok gave children placebo safety controls in undisclosed experiments, New York alleges

TikTok deliberately withheld algorithmic safety protections from millions of users and assigned tens of thousands of others, including children and…

 

Border biometrics move toward better gates, or none at all

The biometric technology needed for a new kind of border control is here. Travelers can already move through airports and…

 

ICE voter data, nonprofit investigations expose expansive surveillance machinery

Newly released records show U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amassed tens of millions of voter records and investigated more…

 

ICE scraps visa vetting system recompete in favor of Palantir Foundry

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has canceled a planned competitive procurement for continued support of its Visa Security Program…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events