FB pixel

ID R&D argues for passive liveness detection in new white paper

ID R&D argues for passive liveness detection in new white paper
 

Passive liveness detection methods, like that of ID R&D’s IDLive Face, can contribute not only to lower user friction, but higher accuracy and lower customer application drop-off rates, according to a new white paper from the company.

Single-Frame Facial Liveness Detection: How it Works to Reduce User Friction and Abandonment’ is a free 11-page report arguing for passive liveness detection as the superior method of facial presentation attack detection (PAD).

The report breaks down the differences between active and passive liveness detection, suggesting that the additional friction imposed by active systems does not prevent them from being defeated by paper masks with cutouts for the eyes and mouth of the face being presented.

ID R&D argues that the advantages of passive liveness detection include the lack of need for user education or instruction, the lower complexity of solution design, support and maintenance, the low burden on user and communication interfaces, and the smaller amount of data transmitted. The use of the same step as for face matching also reduces the opportunity for attackers, the report says. Attackers may not even be aware that they have been subjected to single-frame passive liveness detection.

The white paper covers how passive liveness detection technology works, including how neural networks spot screen replays and printed copies of faces, with the latter analyzing image color to find those “out of gamut” of printed material.

The effect that lower friction in identity verification has on customer acquisition is discussed, with ID R&D contending that the introduction of friction can also drive bona fide presentation classification error rates (BPCER, a measure of how often legitimate users are rejected) higher.

A case study from an ID R&D customer which found the completion rate for applications by new customers rose from 60 percent to over 95 percent which it switched from active to passive liveness.

 

Document liveness case study shows major improvement in fake detection

Internal research from the company indicates that adding document liveness checks to identity verification processes can reduce fraud by up to 42 percent. This is the finding of an unnamed ID R&D customer, described as “large” and “global.”

Several of ID R&D’s partners have found that document spoofs are more common in their system than anticipated, according to the announcement.

The customer in this case ran a test of nearly 100,000 images, passports and ID cards from different countries, which included fakes identified by professional analysts. The rate at which legitimate documents were rejected did not change materially, while the number of fraudulent documents accepted decreased by 42 percent.

IDLive Doc was launched by ID R&D just a few months ago, and the company explained the application of the concept of liveness checks to identity documents in a sponsored post on Biometric Update.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Africa’s altered market may mean new leading tech providers, ID4Africa EC says

For Africa to benefit from the promise of identity, adopting strong governance frameworks and business models to graduate to sustainable…

 

Catalonia prepares digital identity systems for post-quantum security risks

The Cybersecurity Agency of Catalonia is preparing the region’s digital identity infrastructure for the post-quantum era with a €1.2 million…

 

Cabo Verde’s CRVS-ID reforms drive near-universal birth registration

Cabo Verde has increased birth registration to 99 percent within five years after linking its civil registration and national identity…

 

Next considers divesting fingerprint sensor portfolio, delisting from Euronext

The market guidance provided by Next Biometrics in 2025 was too optimistic, and now the company is considering divesting, partnering…

 

Deepfake wave breaking the digital dam; orgs are busy building defenses

Deepfakes are at the door. There are two options: wait until they’re inside to craft a response – or take…

 

EU defends biometric EES rules as border delays and exemptions fuel confusion

The rollout of the EU Entry/Exit System (EES) is exposing operational and political strains in Europe’s biometric border strategy. The…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events