FB pixel

US privacy law catches insurer and Amazon; settlement nears in another case

US privacy law catches insurer and Amazon; settlement nears in another case

The biometric privacy protection law in the U.S. state of Illinois continues to churn though challenges.

A United States district court judge, hearing a business insurance case (1:21-CV-00788) arising from the Biometric Information Protection Act, has denied in part dueling motions for summary judgment. The case is Thermoflex Waukegan vs. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA.

The decision means Mitsui might have to defend Thermoflex, but not today.

Thermoflex faces a putative class action brought by employees who were required to have their palms scanned to clock in and out. The company allegedly did not get express consent, nor did it tell workers how the data would be managed, all of which is necessary under BIPA.

Mitsui has done what insurance companies do – found policy exclusions that protect it from having to spend money defending the policy owner. Lawyers for Thermoflex have tried to find language in the company’s policies that force it to act.

In a memo, the presiding judge writes at lengthy about exclusions and, of course, precedent, and seems to be building to a complete vindication of Mitsui, but ultimately gives Thermoflex, a bittersweet glimmer of hope that Mitsui will have to assist.

Mitsui must defend the plaintiff under an umbrella policy paid for by Thermoflex, but as per that policy, Mitsui is on the hook only after the plaintiff exhaust its primary insurance limits.

Another BIPA complaint involves both a client of Amazon’s Web Services and Web Services itself.

A former supermarket employee initially accused Turing Video in federal court of violating the law with its product, Shield, Law360 reports. But the same plaintiff has also filed a proposed class action in state court against Web Services, which sold cloud services to Turing.

The plaintiff alleges Shield’s mask detection feature uses Rekognition, so the company improperly stored and profited from her biometrics.

Another case, involving Envoy Air, a unit of American Airlines, is winding down. A settlement has been approved by the company and plaintiff workers calling for a $300,000 payment to plaintiffs. According to legal industry news publication Law360, the judge is contemplating a 40 percent fee the workers’ lawyers are requesting.

The judge reportedly will say yea or nay on the fee within two weeks.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


DHS reinterprets foreign worker fees to fund biometric border system

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has proposed a way to fund its Biometric Entry-Exit program by changing the fee…


NIST adds flexibility, digital format to security requirements for federal contractors

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has updated its guidance for how businesses working with the federal government…


Cryptomathic is Belgium’s digital wallet mobile app security provider

Tech from Cryptomathic has been deployed in Belgium’s digital identity wallet, one of the first to go live in the…


Bringing ethics into the discussion on digital identity

A panel at EIC 2024 addresses head-on a topic that lurks around the edges of many discussions of digital ID….


Kantara Initiative launches group devoted to deepfake injection attack threats

“It’s probably not as bad as this makes it seem,” says Andrew Hughes, VP of global standards for FaceTec and…


Seamfix CEO makes case for digital ID as unlocker of Africa’s growth potential

The co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Seamfix, Chimezie Emewulu, has posited that digital identity and related services have the…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events