FB pixel

Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections

BVAS needs reconfiguring following February presidential vote
Categories Biometrics News  |  Elections  |  ID for All
Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections
 

Governorship elections in Nigeria are experiencing technical delays. According to a government announcement, this week’s scheduled election has been pushed by a week, with the country’s electoral commission requiring more time to reconfigure the biometric voting machines that caused controversy during the country’s recent presidential vote.

The Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) uses face and fingerprint scans for biometric authentication. In February, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) used them to conduct a presidential election that opposition parties disputed, and governments in the UK and EU said lacked transparency.

“This decision (to delay) has not been taken lightly,” a statement from INEC (which is no stranger to controversy). “But it is necessary to ensure that there is adequate time to back up the data stored on the over 176,000 BVAS machines from the Presidential and National Assembly elections held on 25th February 2023 and then to reconfigure them for the Governorship and State Assembly elections.”

BVAS machines accredit voters, register votes, and send poll results to an online server. While the February contest saw no problem with the machines’ authentication capabilities in matching voters to their cards, the delivery of results was delayed, prompting opponents to accuse authorities of tampering.

Nigeria’s three main opposition parties — the People’s Democratic Party, Labour Party, and African Democratic Congress — said the re-election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu did not reflect the wishes of Nigerians, and called for a fresh round of elections under a new INEC chairman.

INEC, however, rejected the calls, telling CNN that the results indicated a “free, fair and credible process.” It added, “we wish to reiterate that the Commission is not against litigants inspecting election materials. Consequently, it will continue to grant all litigants access to materials they require to pursue their cases in court.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Passkey adoption by Australian govt, banks drives wider passwordless authentication

It’s high noon for passwords. Across the Authentication Corral, an inscrutable stranger saunters up and puts their hand on the…

 

‘New era in travel’: airports, airlines continue to be sweet spot for biometrics

A fascinating experiment in biometrics would be to find a privacy conscious person who would generally avoid facial recognition, put…

 

Limitations of FRT apparent in search for United Healthcare CEO’s killer

The murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan involved the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) to…

 

OpenID, BIO-key, RSA, SecureAuth showcase at Gartner IAM Summit

The 2024 Gartner Identity & Access Management Summit, running from December 9-11 in Grapevine, Texas, is playing host to names…

 

Aboriginal digital ID offers Indigenous Australians pathway to essential services

There are more than 200,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in Australia who lack a birth certificate. Without this vital…

 

Australia piloting myGov app and Trust Exchange for sharing medical data

The Australian government has launched a pilot of its myGov public services app and Services Australia’s Trust Exchange (TEx) proof-of-concept…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

DIGITAL ID for ALL NEWS

Featured Company

ID for ALL FEATURE REPORTS

BIOMETRICS WHITE PAPERS

BIOMETRICS EVENTS

EXPLAINING BIOMETRICS