FB pixel

Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections

BVAS needs reconfiguring following February presidential vote
Categories Biometrics News  |  Elections  |  ID for All
Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections
 

Governorship elections in Nigeria are experiencing technical delays. According to a government announcement, this week’s scheduled election has been pushed by a week, with the country’s electoral commission requiring more time to reconfigure the biometric voting machines that caused controversy during the country’s recent presidential vote.

The Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) uses face and fingerprint scans for biometric authentication. In February, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) used them to conduct a presidential election that opposition parties disputed, and governments in the UK and EU said lacked transparency.

“This decision (to delay) has not been taken lightly,” a statement from INEC (which is no stranger to controversy). “But it is necessary to ensure that there is adequate time to back up the data stored on the over 176,000 BVAS machines from the Presidential and National Assembly elections held on 25th February 2023 and then to reconfigure them for the Governorship and State Assembly elections.”

BVAS machines accredit voters, register votes, and send poll results to an online server. While the February contest saw no problem with the machines’ authentication capabilities in matching voters to their cards, the delivery of results was delayed, prompting opponents to accuse authorities of tampering.

Nigeria’s three main opposition parties — the People’s Democratic Party, Labour Party, and African Democratic Congress — said the re-election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu did not reflect the wishes of Nigerians, and called for a fresh round of elections under a new INEC chairman.

INEC, however, rejected the calls, telling CNN that the results indicated a “free, fair and credible process.” It added, “we wish to reiterate that the Commission is not against litigants inspecting election materials. Consequently, it will continue to grant all litigants access to materials they require to pursue their cases in court.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

DHS signals major expansion of biometric matching infrastructure

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking industry input on biometric matching software…

 

ROC impresses in NIST biometric age estimation benchmark, Shufti makes debut

Two new entrants to NIST’s Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Age Estimation & Verification, one a debut and the other…

 

Police Scotland plans LFR business case, consultation on the way to a decision: SPA

Police Scotland has not yet made a final decision on implementing live facial recognition (LFR) and has instead announced its…

 

With shift in UK online safety policy, Starmer tells Silicon Valley to ‘bring it on’

A new statement from UK prime minister Keir Starmer outlines his government’s plans to continue developing policies and regulations that…

 

Sri Lanka digital ID Master Systems Integrator expected to be named in March

The selection of an Indian firm as Master System Integrator (MSI) for the Sri Lanka Unique Digital Identity (SL-UDI) is…

 

Photo ID, proof of citizenship take center stage in US voting fight

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE) has become the centerpiece of a renewed congressional fight over who sets the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

DIGITAL ID for ALL NEWS

Featured Company

ID for ALL FEATURE REPORTS

BIOMETRICS WHITE PAPERS

BIOMETRICS EVENTS

EXPLAINING BIOMETRICS