FB pixel

Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections

BVAS needs reconfiguring following February presidential vote
Categories Biometrics News  |  Elections  |  ID for All
Biometric voting machine transmission delays Nigerian governor elections
 

Governorship elections in Nigeria are experiencing technical delays. According to a government announcement, this week’s scheduled election has been pushed by a week, with the country’s electoral commission requiring more time to reconfigure the biometric voting machines that caused controversy during the country’s recent presidential vote.

The Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) uses face and fingerprint scans for biometric authentication. In February, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) used them to conduct a presidential election that opposition parties disputed, and governments in the UK and EU said lacked transparency.

“This decision (to delay) has not been taken lightly,” a statement from INEC (which is no stranger to controversy). “But it is necessary to ensure that there is adequate time to back up the data stored on the over 176,000 BVAS machines from the Presidential and National Assembly elections held on 25th February 2023 and then to reconfigure them for the Governorship and State Assembly elections.”

BVAS machines accredit voters, register votes, and send poll results to an online server. While the February contest saw no problem with the machines’ authentication capabilities in matching voters to their cards, the delivery of results was delayed, prompting opponents to accuse authorities of tampering.

Nigeria’s three main opposition parties — the People’s Democratic Party, Labour Party, and African Democratic Congress — said the re-election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu did not reflect the wishes of Nigerians, and called for a fresh round of elections under a new INEC chairman.

INEC, however, rejected the calls, telling CNN that the results indicated a “free, fair and credible process.” It added, “we wish to reiterate that the Commission is not against litigants inspecting election materials. Consequently, it will continue to grant all litigants access to materials they require to pursue their cases in court.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Clearview AI prototype points to next phase of facial recognition: identity intelligence

Clearview AI has developed an experimental AI tool that could extend a facial recognition search into broader automated research on…

 

AI agents change the identity security question in the middle of enterprises’ answer

The digital identity industry has been diligently working on how to authenticate people without risking exposure to fraud attacks, particularly…

 

The next bottleneck for African digital identity is infrastructure, not software

Africa’s next wave of digital identity investment may have surprisingly little to do with biometrics, wallets or credentials. In early…

 

TrustED tests whether Europe’s digital identity model can preserve privacy in the real world

Europe’s digital identity ambitions are approaching an important deadline. By the end of 2026, EU Member States are expected to…

 

A biometric system can be accurate and still fail an accessibility test

By Joshua W.J. Brown Biometric authentication has mature ways to talk about comparison error. That is exactly why accessibility failures…

 

Philippines pushes platform accountability, seeks ASEAN backing for tougher social media rules

The Philippines is getting tougher on social media platforms and called attention to the backlash that Meta in particular has…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events