FB pixel

Facial recognition gains for shoplifting investigations jeopardized by policy gaps

Facial recognition gains for shoplifting investigations jeopardized by policy gaps
 

Facial recognition is being used to identify shoplifters in London and in Evansville, Indiana, but also generating controversy.

Metropolitan Police have matched 149 suspects from 302 still images captured by CCTV cameras after writing to a dozen major retailers in London to collect images of each’s 30 top shoplifting offenders, the BBC reports.

Met Commissioner Mark Rowley, who has been among the leaders of the push for facial recognition to combat shoplifting, called the results “game-changing,” and says they show that most of those caught “are career criminals involved in serious crime.”

In Evansville, Indiana, police are using Clearview AI to help identify shoplifters, but an article in local publication The Evansville Courier & Press suggests they are playing fast and loose with probable cause rules.

The article notes that Clearview’s terms of use, as well as past comments from CEO Hoan Ton-That, make clear that facial recognition matches have the same value as anonymous tips. Local police, however, have claimed positive identifications with the technology,

EPD Chief Billy Bolin says Clearview has been used by officers on patrol to identify people they encounter with biometrics.

The federal Department of Justice’s facial recognition policy clearly states that “Face recognition search results are not considered positive identification and do not establish probable cause, without further investigation.” Indiana State Police policy says matches are to be treated only as a lead, not positive identification. A local prosecutor compared facial recognition to polygraph lie detector tests, which are allowed to be used as evidence in court only under certain conditions.

The analysis of documents obtained by Courier & Press shows that facial recognition has been used as part of the probable cause for arrest warrants issued by Vanderburgh County judges. The vast majority cited additional evidence, according to the report. The lack of a specific policy for police, and apparently of understanding on the part of the judiciary, however, is fuel for opponents of the technology’s use in law enforcement.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Challenges in face biometrics addressed with new tech and research amid high stakes

Big biometrics contracts and deals were the theme of several of the stories on that drew the most interest from…

 

Online age verification debates continue in Canada, EU, India

Introducing age verification to protect children online remains a hot topic across the globe: Canada is debating the Online Harms…

 

Login.gov adds selfie biometrics for May pilot

America’s single-sign on system for government benefits and services, Login.gov, is getting a face biometrics option for enhanced identity verification…

 

BIPA one step closer to seeing its first major change since 2008 inception

On Thursday, a bipartisan majority in the Illinois Senate approved the first major change to Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act…

 

Identity verification industry mulls solutions to flood of synthetic IDs

The advent of AI-powered generators such as OnlyFake, which creates realistic-looking photos of fake IDs for only US$15, has stirred…

 

Idemia discusses faster police operations, improved outcomes with livescan biometrics

Biometrics, and fingerprints in particular, have long been one of the pillars of forensics work performed by police and crime…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events