FB pixel

Australia invites a select few to bid for national digital ID contract

Australia invites a select few to bid for national digital ID contract
 

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), the nation’s digital identity competition regulator, is issuing  a limited tender to build the platform that will house its national digital ID system. It has invited just 5 to 10 vendors to submit a request for quote on the platform, and refuses to share if any local suppliers are among them or how much the project will cost, according to InnovationAus.

The RFQ issued last week on the BuyICT platform sought to find an “experienced provider” to develop the digital ID system. It has only invited 5 to 10 companies to submit a request to bid on the platform. The listing says it is seeking a one-year contract that would start in January and can be extended for one 6 month term.

Australian companies outside the chosen few are frustrated at being deprived of the opportunity to bid on what will be an essential part of the plan for the Australian Government’s Digital ID System (AGDIS). Over the past five years of development, the digital ID project has already cost over $600 million.

A spokesperson for the ACCC says that it cannot disclose who was approached until the tender closes on December 13th. It will close sooner if all invited applicants respond before the deadline.

Courtenay Hollis, co-founder of Australian IT firm Imminently, says the limited tender is “inappropriate” in the development of a platform that will govern a system managing Australians’ biometric data.

He says that inviting a select few suppliers who are likely to be large multinational companies with dedicated national sales teams limits what can be done through local suppliers. “It’s not creating a genuine opportunity to understand local innovations and achieve value for money assessments,” he tells InnovationAus.com.

The Digital Marketplace, which is now part of the BuyICT platform, began as a way to connect smaller suppliers with more opportunities. Increasingly, however, it is used to “select source” preferred companies. “It has gotten out of control to the point that I believe it breaches the Government’s anti-competitive laws,” says Hollis.

Sometime next year, it will be put into law that the ACCC is the formal regulator of AGDIS, according to the report. It will oversee the digital ID accreditation scheme and operation of the system, and manage accreditation for approved digital ID providers. Last month, the organization began recruiting directors to manage the accreditation team.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Will Scotland be the first nation to pass primary legislation covering live FRT?

The Scottish privacy commissioner continues to express consternation over the potential use of live facial recognition by Police Scotland. Meanwhile,…

 

France Identité app launches sandbox for iOS, proves age check privacy bona fides

France Identité, the French government’s mobile app for digital identity verification, has made its sandbox build available in iOS. Writing…

 

Digital ID success at scale hinges on tech, governance, adoption: IN Groupe

A study by French identity provider IN Groupe has established that digital identity systems succeed at scale only when countries…

 

New book makes case for DPI as fully integrated ecosystem

Digital development specialist Pedro Tavares has published a book that outlines how governments can successfully build digital states with digital…

 

Agentic AI pushes financial sector toward continuous identity

Agentic AI is forcing a rethink of identity and authentication in payments, as systems designed for human approval struggle to…

 

New Reality Defender Ethics Committee not mere theater, says CEO

“Most ethics committees are theater. This is not one of those.” So begins a new post from Reality Defender CEO…

Comments

One Reply to “Australia invites a select few to bid for national digital ID contract”

  1. So the ACCC. who so far has had nothing to do with digital IDs, is now the regulator for Australia’s Digital ID infrastructure? Who’s genius idea was that?
    They are just recruiting personnel now, so as an organisation they have no track record with any of this technology. This is a great recipe for another disaster like the $80 million dollar National Face Recognition and AFIS database that turned into a law suit between the Aust Govt and one of the Big 3 Biometric vendors.

    One of the many findings by the PwC report into that disaster was the fact that project managers on both sides (vendor and supplier) changed repeatedly during the build process and major project requirements were left out because there was no local knowledge involved. Is that what we will get again as the large vendors with Headquarters overseas bring in temporary overseas staff for the project?

    I agree completely with Courtney Hollis. The DigitalMarketplace fails to support both local Australian companies and local expertise.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events