FB pixel

California facial recognition bill aims to keep citizens safe from false arrests

California facial recognition bill aims to keep citizens safe from false arrests
 

San Francisco assembly member Phil Ting has introduced AB 1814, a bill that would prevent police from using facial recognition technology (FRT) matches for probable cause in California, with hearings expected to take place this spring. Under the bill, law enforcement would not be able to base a search, arrest or affidavit for a warrant solely on an FRT match.

The bill refers to using facial recognition for 1:n matching where the face of an unidentified person is biometrically compared to a database of known individuals. Officers must also examine any information taken from facial recognition systems carefully and consider the possibility that the matches could be inaccurate.

The aim of the bill is to prevent false arrests from the use of face recognition.

“While facial recognition technology can be helpful in solving cases, one person arrested from an incorrect match is one too many. By requiring additional evidence, we can help protect people’s privacy and due process rights,” said Ting in an announcement for the bill.

His previous bill, AB 1215, placed a temporary ban on the use of FRTs but expired in 2023. Ting also introduced AB 642 last year, which would require the establishment of written standards for privacy and security when dealing with face biometrics data, but it was held up in committee.

Under the new bill, local governments within the state of California can still elect to ban its use entirely.

At the end of 2023, Baltimore introduced a bill to increase transparency in how police use FRT in their work.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

BorderAge promises 100% anonymous age assurance with hand gesture modality

Imagine a magician who waves their hands not to conjure a white rabbit, but to provide age assurance without collecting…

 

euCONSENT’s tokenized age verification set for PoC at upcoming age assurance summit

The European Union has its own ideas about how age assurance should be carried out for restricted online services, and…

 

Humanity Protocol launches Humanity Foundation ahead of ‘big moves’

Humanity Protocol, one of the emergent contenders in the market for proof of personhood (PoP), has announced the launch of…

 

J.P. Morgan adds 2 biometric authentication terminals to payments ecosystem

J.P. Morgan Payments (JPM) has announced the release of two new proprietary biometric payments terminals for retail, restaurant and entertainment…

 

Prove acquires reusable digital ID verification firm Portabl

A post on Prove’s blog says the acquisition of digital ID startup Portabl “will enable Prove to enhance its industry-leading…

 

Socure: Nation-state fraud ramping up in 2025

Socure, a leading digital identity verification platform, believes 2025 will be the breakout year for digital identity verification in the…

Comments

One Reply to “California facial recognition bill aims to keep citizens safe from false arrests”

  1. I fully support California AB 1814.

    I have worked for or consulted for three of the leading facial recognition vendors, as measured by NIST FRTE testing.

    But none of these three companies would claim that their technology should serve as anything other than an investigative lead.

    If all agencies only used facial recognition as an investigative lead, none of the headline grabbing false arrests would have occurred.

    I’ll say it again: investigative lead.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events