FB pixel

Migration identity policy should follow KYC’s example: researcher

Migration identity policy should follow KYC’s example: researcher
 

Organizations that guarantee migrants’ identities and onboard undocumented and unregistered individuals into public registries should have more policy and legal guidance, according to a new paper that explores the legal and sociological aspects of biometric technology in border settings.

The paper, published in the International Journal of Digital Law and Governance, outlines recommendations on handling identity in migration during complex or “borderline” situations, including refugees, internally displaced people, stateless individuals and nomads. The paper was authored by legal and policy researcher Riccardo Vecellio Segate who attempts to examine technical standards, biometrics and remote digital identity onboarding in borderline contexts as well as the role of organizations that manage identities.

“KYC solutions for remote customer onboarding in the banking sectors are frequently illustrated with technical flowcharts, even within official policy documents,” writes Segate. “The same effort should be made with scenarios of borderline citizenship, where the remote identity onboarding of individuals becomes extremely complex technically and operationally, but also legally, diplomacy-wise, and ‘geopolitically’.”

The research outlines policy recommendations on technical standards for cross-border identity management and for enhancing the trust of organizations that manage identities, also known as “introducers.” These organizations are seen as mediating between undocumented communities and central state administrations.

Segate also cautions against involving private actors in defining policy issues and the selection of technical standards, noting that they often ignore “borderline citizenship” situations or impose financial penalties on migrants experiencing such situations.

“Private entities keep playing an exceedingly problematic standard-setting role for identity applications and beyond, by actively engaging with policymakers and technical bodies towards the negotiation, socialization, and legal ‘hardening’ of standards they will be massively profiting from,” says Segate.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Passkey adoption by Australian govt, banks drives wider passwordless authentication

It’s high noon for passwords. Across the Authentication Corral, an inscrutable stranger saunters up and puts their hand on the…

 

‘New era in travel’: airports, airlines continue to be sweet spot for biometrics

A fascinating experiment in biometrics would be to find a privacy conscious person who would generally avoid facial recognition, put…

 

Limitations of FRT apparent in search for United Healthcare CEO’s killer

The murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan involved the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) to…

 

OpenID, BIO-key, RSA, SecureAuth showcase at Gartner IAM Summit

The 2024 Gartner Identity & Access Management Summit, running from December 9-11 in Grapevine, Texas, is playing host to names…

 

Aboriginal digital ID offers Indigenous Australians pathway to essential services

There are more than 200,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in Australia who lack a birth certificate. Without this vital…

 

Australia piloting myGov app and Trust Exchange for sharing medical data

The Australian government has launched a pilot of its myGov public services app and Services Australia’s Trust Exchange (TEx) proof-of-concept…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

DIGITAL ID for ALL NEWS

Featured Company

ID for ALL FEATURE REPORTS

BIOMETRICS WHITE PAPERS

BIOMETRICS EVENTS

EXPLAINING BIOMETRICS