FB pixel

Migration identity policy should follow KYC’s example: researcher

Migration identity policy should follow KYC’s example: researcher
 

Organizations that guarantee migrants’ identities and onboard undocumented and unregistered individuals into public registries should have more policy and legal guidance, according to a new paper that explores the legal and sociological aspects of biometric technology in border settings.

The paper, published in the International Journal of Digital Law and Governance, outlines recommendations on handling identity in migration during complex or “borderline” situations, including refugees, internally displaced people, stateless individuals and nomads. The paper was authored by legal and policy researcher Riccardo Vecellio Segate who attempts to examine technical standards, biometrics and remote digital identity onboarding in borderline contexts as well as the role of organizations that manage identities.

“KYC solutions for remote customer onboarding in the banking sectors are frequently illustrated with technical flowcharts, even within official policy documents,” writes Segate. “The same effort should be made with scenarios of borderline citizenship, where the remote identity onboarding of individuals becomes extremely complex technically and operationally, but also legally, diplomacy-wise, and ‘geopolitically’.”

The research outlines policy recommendations on technical standards for cross-border identity management and for enhancing the trust of organizations that manage identities, also known as “introducers.” These organizations are seen as mediating between undocumented communities and central state administrations.

Segate also cautions against involving private actors in defining policy issues and the selection of technical standards, noting that they often ignore “borderline citizenship” situations or impose financial penalties on migrants experiencing such situations.

“Private entities keep playing an exceedingly problematic standard-setting role for identity applications and beyond, by actively engaging with policymakers and technical bodies towards the negotiation, socialization, and legal ‘hardening’ of standards they will be massively profiting from,” says Segate.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

NIST sees biometrics developers closing in on operational morph detection

Biometrics developers are getting better at detecting face morphs, even if facial recognition algorithms aren’t. Day 2 of the EAB’s…

 

Big talk on imminent UK social media law as consultation closes

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is promising to act “very, very quickly” to put legal age restrictions on social media…

 

Regula warns most organizations don’t know what bots are doing, or why

The latest report from Regula underlines the discrepancy between what’s happening to companies in the AI age, and how seriously…

 

UK digital ID consultation advances to 120-member People’s Panel

The UK’s digital ecosystem is still digesting the government’s public consultation on digital ID, and what can and should be…

 

Signicat adds Austria ID as Europe prepares for EUDI Wallet transition

Signicat has added Austria’s electronic ID system to its unified platform for national eIDs and EU Digital Identity (EUDI) wallets,…

 

Injection attack detection critical to digital security yet often misunderstood

The most influential factor in the tech market is pace. When a new technology appears, it inevitably kicks off a…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

DIGITAL ID for ALL NEWS

Featured Company

ID for ALL FEATURE REPORTS

BIOMETRICS WHITE PAPERS

BIOMETRICS EVENTS

EXPLAINING BIOMETRICS