FB pixel

Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings

Plaintiffs say tech is designed to ‘illegally and surreptitiously’ record voice biometrics
Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings
 

Users of Amazon’s Alexa are clear to pursue a class action over allegedly illegal recordings of private conversations. In Seattle, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled that users meet the legal threshold to sue in a nationwide class action for monetary damages, and a court order to stop the alleged violations.

A report from Reuters identifies the case in question as Kaeli Garner v. Amazon.com, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, filed in 2021. It is being brought on behalf of users who registered one or more Alexa devices, Amazon’s AI personal assistant device that is supposedly activated with a “wake word” or key phrase.

Plaintiffs say their Alexas recorded bits of billions of conversations, “beyond commands aimed at Alexa,” without their knowledge, and that Amazon violated state consumer protection law by failing to disclose the retention and use of voice biometrics for commercial gain. They are seeking a court order that would force Amazon to destroy any existing recordings and related data.

“Sometimes Alexa begins streaming when a wake word was not, in fact, used,” says the suit. “These events are called ‘false wakes.’”

“Plaintiffs assert that both the permanent storage of Alexa interactions and the false wakes are intentional design elements of the service, used to amass huge numbers of voice recordings that can be fed into algorithms and machine learning platforms for continuous improvement training.”

The judge says the scale of the violation makes a class action suitable.

“The fact that millions of people were allegedly injured by the same conduct suggests that representative litigation is the only way to both adjudicate related claims and avoid overwhelming the courts,” says Lasnik’s statement.

Amazon has declined to comment, but has previously denied any wrongdoing in the lawsuit and said it built Alexa with safeguards to prevent accidental activations that could lead to noncompliance on biometrics laws.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Clearview AI contract links Army special forces to wider intelligence ecosystem

A small U.S. Army special forces purchase of Clearview AI facial recognition licenses has exposed a broader defense intelligence pipeline…

 

OECD urges mandatory use of shared infrastructure to scale DPI adoption

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has recommended that in order for countries to broaden the use of…

 

G+D sets up Montreal AI lab with Mila to strengthen EU-Canada collaboration

Montreal-based artificial intelligence research institute Mila and Munich mobile security giant Giesecke+Devrient (G+D), have partnered to strengthen the link between…

 

World shifts from crypto identity experiment to enterprise proof-of-humanity

Tools for Humanity, the Sam Altman co-founded startup that creates digital IDs based on iris scans, has officially formulated a…

 

Ayanworks and Digi Yatra demonstrate global interoperability for DTCs in IATA trial

The dream of digital convenience while keeping privacy in international air travel is moving closer. India’s Ayanworks and the Digi…

 

Vietnam targets biometric identification at 80% of airports by 2030

Vietnam has approved a national project to modernize airport security and accelerate digital transformation across its aviation sector. The nationwide…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events