FB pixel

Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings

Plaintiffs say tech is designed to ‘illegally and surreptitiously’ record voice biometrics
Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings
 

Users of Amazon’s Alexa are clear to pursue a class action over allegedly illegal recordings of private conversations. In Seattle, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled that users meet the legal threshold to sue in a nationwide class action for monetary damages, and a court order to stop the alleged violations.

A report from Reuters identifies the case in question as Kaeli Garner v. Amazon.com, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, filed in 2021. It is being brought on behalf of users who registered one or more Alexa devices, Amazon’s AI personal assistant device that is supposedly activated with a “wake word” or key phrase.

Plaintiffs say their Alexas recorded bits of billions of conversations, “beyond commands aimed at Alexa,” without their knowledge, and that Amazon violated state consumer protection law by failing to disclose the retention and use of voice biometrics for commercial gain. They are seeking a court order that would force Amazon to destroy any existing recordings and related data.

“Sometimes Alexa begins streaming when a wake word was not, in fact, used,” says the suit. “These events are called ‘false wakes.’”

“Plaintiffs assert that both the permanent storage of Alexa interactions and the false wakes are intentional design elements of the service, used to amass huge numbers of voice recordings that can be fed into algorithms and machine learning platforms for continuous improvement training.”

The judge says the scale of the violation makes a class action suitable.

“The fact that millions of people were allegedly injured by the same conduct suggests that representative litigation is the only way to both adjudicate related claims and avoid overwhelming the courts,” says Lasnik’s statement.

Amazon has declined to comment, but has previously denied any wrongdoing in the lawsuit and said it built Alexa with safeguards to prevent accidental activations that could lead to noncompliance on biometrics laws.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Sphinx raises $7.1m to expand AI-powered compliance agents

Identity checks were once reliant on human eyes and human discernment, but making sure people and entities are who they…

 

Identity fraud revs up in the automotive sector as purchases move online

Like most industries, the automotive sector is dealing with a spike in fraud. A survey snapshot released by identity provider…

 

DHS RIVR results suggest most ID document validation disastrously ineffective

The results of the identity document validation track within the 2025 Remote Identity Validation Rally are sobering. They indicate that…

 

DHS signals major expansion of biometric matching infrastructure

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking industry input on biometric matching software…

 

ROC impresses in NIST biometric age estimation benchmark, Shufti makes debut

Two new entrants to NIST’s Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Age Estimation & Verification, one a debut and the other…

 

Online dating at risk as romance scams, deepfakes infiltrate platforms

Online dating sites are being flooded with deepfakes and AI content, making it hard for users to distinguish real matches…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events