FB pixel

Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings

Plaintiffs say tech is designed to ‘illegally and surreptitiously’ record voice biometrics
Alexa, sue Amazon: tech giant faces class action over voice recordings
 

Users of Amazon’s Alexa are clear to pursue a class action over allegedly illegal recordings of private conversations. In Seattle, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled that users meet the legal threshold to sue in a nationwide class action for monetary damages, and a court order to stop the alleged violations.

A report from Reuters identifies the case in question as Kaeli Garner v. Amazon.com, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, filed in 2021. It is being brought on behalf of users who registered one or more Alexa devices, Amazon’s AI personal assistant device that is supposedly activated with a “wake word” or key phrase.

Plaintiffs say their Alexas recorded bits of billions of conversations, “beyond commands aimed at Alexa,” without their knowledge, and that Amazon violated state consumer protection law by failing to disclose the retention and use of voice biometrics for commercial gain. They are seeking a court order that would force Amazon to destroy any existing recordings and related data.

“Sometimes Alexa begins streaming when a wake word was not, in fact, used,” says the suit. “These events are called ‘false wakes.’”

“Plaintiffs assert that both the permanent storage of Alexa interactions and the false wakes are intentional design elements of the service, used to amass huge numbers of voice recordings that can be fed into algorithms and machine learning platforms for continuous improvement training.”

The judge says the scale of the violation makes a class action suitable.

“The fact that millions of people were allegedly injured by the same conduct suggests that representative litigation is the only way to both adjudicate related claims and avoid overwhelming the courts,” says Lasnik’s statement.

Amazon has declined to comment, but has previously denied any wrongdoing in the lawsuit and said it built Alexa with safeguards to prevent accidental activations that could lead to noncompliance on biometrics laws.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Indonesia seeks facial liveness technology for national digital ID

Indonesia is seeking to strengthen the security of its digital ID ecosystem with a market consultation focused on biometric liveness…

 

Aylo backs Apple’s device-based age assurance model in Australia

Ponography streaming giant Aylo has released a statement welcoming age-verified Australian iOS users back to its flagship site, Pornhub, and…

 

Biometric authentication still needs an accessible fallback

By Manisha Varma Kamarushiis, UX & Accessibility Researcher Biometric authentication has changed the way people unlock devices and access sensitive…

 

Union Biometrics scores major military, financial sector deals

Union Biometrics has won the largest contract in the company’s history: a 17.1 billion won (about $12.8 million) deal with…

 

Palm vein biometrics pilot launched at Brazil-Paraguay bridge border crossing

A pilot project newly launched by the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service sees palm biometrics deployed for pedestrian crossings at the…

 

Twyn earns iBeta Level 2 for facial liveness detection

Brazil-based identity firm Twyn’s facial liveness technology has achieved iBeta Level 2 compliance against the ISO/IEC 30107-3 standard for Presentation…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events