FB pixel

Academics blast “legal vacuum” around facial biometrics use by British police

 

The use of facial recognition by police in Britain are a costly use of public funds that should be subject to more rigorous testing and transparency, according to research by a pair of academics in England and Australia and reported by Phys.org.

Dr. Joe Purshouse of the University of East Anglia School of Law and Professor Liz Campbell of Monash University authored the report, which appeared in the February 8 issue of the Criminal Law Review. They say Met Police’ trials have cost £200,000 (US$259,000), while trials by South Wales Police cost £2.6 million ($3.36 million).

“These FRT trials have been operating in a legal vacuum. There is currently no legal framework specifically regulating the police use of FRT,” says Purshouse, according to Phys.org.

“Parliament should set out rules governing the scope of the power of the police to deploy FRT surveillance in public spaces to ensure consistency across police forces. As it currently stands, police forces trialling FRT are left to come up with divergent, and sometimes troubling, policies and practices for the execution of their FRT operations.”

The UK Home Office has received frequent criticism for failing to address the perceived legal vacuum.

The researchers are also concerned with the inclusion “persons of interest,” who may not be suspects or missing persons, in watch lists. They also say those with old or minor convictions, ethnic minorities or women could be disproportionately affected by facial recognition, and expressed concerns about the technology’s accuracy.

“There appears to be a credible risk that FRT technology will undermine the legitimacy of the police in the eyes of already over-policed groups,” Purshouse says.

They conclude that the technology’s increasing use is occurring without an adequate understanding of its complex consequences.

The performance of the facial recognition technology used by South Wales Police has improved, but is remains uninspiring in the field, according to a recent report. The trials are being investigated by the UK’s Information Commissioner and legally challenged on multiple fronts.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Cybercrime and identity fraud: an Olympic challenge

By Grigory Yusupov, Regional Director UK and Rest of the World (ROW) at IDnow The Paris 2024 Olympics is set…

 

IDV providers respond to growing consumer demand for stronger fraud prevention

A range of digital identity and financial fraud prevention capabilities and solution updates have been released just as Veriff issues…

 

Biometrics developers dance with data privacy regulations continues

Biometrics controversy and investments are often found side by side, as seen in many of this week’s top stories on…

 

EU AI Act should revise its risk-based approach: Report

Another voice has joined the chorus criticizing the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, this time arguing that important provisions of…

 

Swiss e-ID resists rushing trust infrastructure

Switzerland is debating on how to proceed with the technical implementation of its national digital identity as the 2026 deadline…

 

Former Jumio exec joins digital ID web 3.0 project

Move over Worldcoin, there’s a new kid on the block vying for the attention of the digital identity industry and…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events