FB pixel

Spanish data protection regulator targets 14 misconceptions about biometrics in technical note

Spanish data protection regulator targets 14 misconceptions about biometrics in technical note
 

Unauthorized access to biometric data in one system would allow the biometrics to be used in the rest of systems which use such data, the Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) claims in a technical note on 14 common misconceptions about biometrics.

The note was developed in cooperation with the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), and addresses what the AEPD says are misunderstanding people have about biometric technology.

According to the AEPD, some people believe biometric data is stored as an algorithm, and the agency clarifies that it is stored as a template, and the algorithm comes in when it is analyzed for identification and authentication processes. The AEPD also argues that biometric data is more intrusive than other identification and authentication methods, because it reveals more personal information about the subject, and also that it is probabilistic, rather than 100 percent accurate.

The AEPD also notes that biometric technology can not always differentiate between two people, that some people cannot use certain biometric systems due to their physical characteristics, and that biometric processes can be spoofed. The public availability of faces and other biometric factors means that biometric information is exposed, the regulator says.

AEPD believes that biometric identification and authentication are not safer for users than other methodologies, and that systems using only biometrics for authentication are inherently insecure, by definition, as single-factor systems. Biometric systems may not always be comfortable for users, and partial reconstructions from templates that may be sufficient to fool other biometric systems are possible, the note says.

Even if biometric data is converted to a hash, AEPD cites an article in the EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing which suggests it may be possible to obtain biometric data, or reverse the process.

The agency says the document is intended for data protection officers and others to help them understand the complexities of biometrics.

The AEPD warned businesses that facial recognition use as part of COVID-19 screening systems is only legal under GDPR under certain conditions.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Broad biometrics adoption in new and established markets spurs investor action

The growth of biometrics in emerging industries like age verification and established ones like payments is dovetailing with the adoption…

 

Can facial age estimation save Roblox from more lawsuits?

Come January, if you want to chat in Roblox, you’ll need to let digital identity firm Persona estimate your age….

 

How commercial surveillance tools became essential to FBI investigations

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has come to rely on Clearview AI, Babel Street, and ZeroFox to support its…

 

Alaska seeks major AI overhaul of state services through myAlaska mobile app

Alaska is exploring a sweeping redesign of its statewide digital services platform, issuing a Request for Information (RFI) that signals…

 

No pints with digital ID or porn from Belize for UK revelers this Christmas

UK drinkers raising a glass to former Technology Secretary Peter Kyle this Christmas would best honour him with a glass…

 

African digital ID systems need better governance by stronger independent bodies: Researchers

Digital ID systems backed by biometrics are being imposed on Africans, preventing millions from receiving essential services they are entitled…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events