FB pixel

Clearview AI loses bid to dismiss biometric privacy suit brought by Vermont AG

 

facial-recognition-database

A biometric data privacy lawsuit brought by Vermont Attorney General TJ Donovan against Clearview AI will move forward after a Vermont Superior Court rejected the company’s motion to dismiss the case. Clearview had argued its actions are protected by the First Amendment and “near absolute immunity” bestowed by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and also that the State’s claims were unconstitutionally vague and lack standing.

In the ruling,  Judge Helen M. Toor writes that the claim Clearview deceived Vermonters about being able to remove their images from the company’s facial recognition database is not protected by the First Amendment. She also ruled that Clearview’s “non-expressive speech,” such as poor security measures for biometric data, are not protected. Section 230 of the CDA does not apply to Clearview either, according to Toor, as the claim involves the collection of data, not its distribution.

The State’s allegations were also found to be adequate to support an unfairness claim under the Consumer Protection Act, and that by exposing those in the state to unwanted surveillance and marketing its face biometrics product to law enforcement, Clearview may have caused substantial injury.

The court did not entirely side with Vermont, however, striking down one of six claims of deception, and an argument that Clearview violated a Data Broker Law, as “fraud” in that case refers to a traditional sense, rather than “consumer fraud,” and Clearview is registered in the state as a data broker.

“Clearview’s actions in acquiring the photos is akin to someone walking into a store and surreptitiously stealing an item. In that example, the person’s action might be larceny and it might Violate the store’s posted rules, but it is not fraud because it does not involve a misrepresentation,” Toor writes.

Clearview CEO Hoan Ton-That has called the company’s place in biometric privacy debates “an honor”, and the company is currently attempting to have at least some of the numerous suits filed against it consolidated.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Will Scotland be the first nation to pass primary legislation covering live FRT?

The Scottish privacy commissioner continues to express consternation over the potential use of live facial recognition by Police Scotland. Meanwhile,…

 

France Identité app launches sandbox for iOS, proves age check privacy bona fides

France Identité, the French government’s mobile app for digital identity verification, has made its sandbox build available in iOS. Writing…

 

Digital ID success at scale hinges on tech, governance, adoption: IN Groupe

A study by French identity provider IN Groupe has established that digital identity systems succeed at scale only when countries…

 

New book makes case for DPI as fully integrated ecosystem

Digital development specialist Pedro Tavares has published a book that outlines how governments can successfully build digital states with digital…

 

Agentic AI pushes financial sector toward continuous identity

Agentic AI is forcing a rethink of identity and authentication in payments, as systems designed for human approval struggle to…

 

New Reality Defender Ethics Committee not mere theater, says CEO

“Most ethics committees are theater. This is not one of those.” So begins a new post from Reality Defender CEO…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events