FB pixel

Competition results show iris biometric liveness detection a work in progress

Competition results show iris biometric liveness detection a work in progress
 

The 2020 edition of the Iris Liveness Detection competition (LivDet-Iris) has been held, with significant increases in difficulty resulting in weaker spoof attack detection performance over the previous competitions.

The event is held to assess and highlight advances in presentation attack detection (PAD) for iris biometric systems. Organizers included Stephanie Schuckers of Clarkson University, Adam Czajka of the University of Notre Dame and Arun Ross of Michigan State University, as well as academics from universities around the world and the Idiap Research Institute in Switzerland.

Iris recognition sensors from LG, IrisGuard, Iris ID, and IriTech were used to collect biometric images. No training dataset was offered, and the competition analysts attribute the lower attack detection rate compared to previous years to the introduction of novel attack types, the increased complexity of the test datasets, and possible variability between training and test datasets.

The 2020 version of the competition introduced new types of attacks, specifically with the eyes of deceased people, prosthetic eyes and samples displayed on a screen. It also initiated the competition as an on-going project, with a testing protocol available via the Biometrics Evaluation and Testing (BEAT) platform hosted by Idiap. The performance of submissions was also compared with three baseline methods, provided by Notre Dame and MSU, and three open-source PAD methods. The two PAD baseline algorithms provided by MSU were found to be much more accurate for attack detection than any others.

Other attack methods considered include printed irises and patterned contact lenses.

The winning entry, from USACH/TOC (Universidad de Santiago – Chile and Chile’s TOC Biometrics) detected spoofs with an APCER (Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate) of 59.1 percent and a BPCER (Bona-fide Presentation Classification Error Rate) of 0.46 percent. The best performing algorithm in the first LivDet-Iris, which was held in 2013, had an APCER of 5.7 percent, and a BPCER of 28.6 percent. By the third and most recent competition in 2017, the best result was an APCER of 14.71 percent and a BPCER of 3.36 percent. Other entries in the 2020 competition, from “Competitor-3” and Fraunhofer IGD in Germany, also had much higher APCER scores than entries in previous years, and the Fraunhofer team’s entry was just slightly behind the USACH/TOC team’s in overall detection accuracy.

The paper will be presented at the International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB 2020), which begins at the end of September.

This post was updated at 8:59 AM on Wednesday, September 9 2020 to include Adam Czajka as an organizer of the event.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Harvard, Linux Foundation launch open-source wallet for selective data sharing

The internet is seeing a wide-scale push towards identity verification and age assurance, but the question remains: how can users…

 

Facephi graduates from startup phase with positive 2025 net, EBITDA surge

Revenue from Facephi’s core biometrics and its newer digital identity and fraud prevention portfolio grew by 24.6 percent in 2025,…

 

Opinions on UK Online Safety Act emphasize importance of enforcement

Online safety legislation is making headlines around the world. But in places where laws have taken effect, are they proving…

 

UK Home Office raises estimate for passport contract to 12 years, £576M

The UK Home Office has opened a third round of market engagement for its next major passport manufacturing and personalization…

 

US lawmakers move to restrict AI chatbots used by kids

A bipartisan pair of House and Senate bills would impose new federal restrictions on AI chatbots, including a ban on…

 

Utah age assurance law for VPN users takes effect this week

Privacy advocates and virtual private network (VPN) providers are up in arms over Utah’s Senate Bill 73 (SB 73), “Online…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events