FB pixel

FaceTec prevails in ‘Zoom’ trademark case

 

passive biometric liveness

The EU General Court has ruled that FaceTec’s ‘Zoom’ trademark for face biometric liveness detection software does not infringe upon any of Japan-based audio equipment manufacturer Zoom KK’s existing marks, reports World IP Review.

The decision was made by the second chamber of the General Court on June 30, upholding a 2020 decision by the European Intellectual Property Office’s (EUIPO).

According to the EU court, Zoom KK has failed to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion between the two marks, regardless of both being registered under Class 9 of the Nice Agreement.

“To acknowledge similarity in all cases in which competing rights cover computer programs or software would clearly exceed the scope of the protection granted by the legislature to the proprietor of a trademark,” the General Court explained.

The court decided on the basis that while both marks refer to software, they are related to different goods: a sound recording solution and a biometric presentation attack detection (PAD) one, respectively.

For context, FaceTec had first applied for its ‘Zoom’ mark with the EUIPO in October 2016, describing the tool as a “security software that allows users to secure and access their mobile devices through multi-dimensional facial recognition identification.”

Zoom KK then filed a lawsuit on the basis that the FaceTec application infringed on its EU wordmark ‘Zoom,’ which the company first registered in 1999 under classes 9 and 15.

Both the EUIPO’s opposition division and the Board of Appeals dismissed Zoom KK’s opposition in the course of the last few years, leading it to appeal to the General Court.

The latter admitted that from a visual, phonetic, and conceptual perspective (excepting the font), the marks are “practically identical.”

However, since the distinctiveness of the ‘Zoom’ mark is lower than average, the court concluded, FaceTec’s mark is not likely to cause confusion.

“A multitude of software or programs with radically different functions can be found in the same stores, whether physical or virtual, without consumers automatically believing that they have the same origin,” the court clarified.

FaceTec recently reached a pair of deals to provide its Zoom (sometimes written ‘ZoOm’) biometric spoof detection technology to Scytáles and Onfido.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Oops! UK government says sorry for the mix-up with wallet announcement

UK Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Peter Kyle has reportedly apologized to the biometrics and digital identity…

 

EU seeks feedback on age assurance, child protection under DSA

The EU has issued an official call for feedback for guidelines on protecting minors online under the Digital Services Act…

 

Kenyan MPs want proof of biometric data deletion claim by World

Some members of Kenya’s National Assembly expect to get concrete proof from the government about full compliance with a court…

 

5 key components of deepfake threat mitigation: Reality Defender

When deepfakes attack, who you gonna call? This is the fundamental question posed in a new blog from Reality Defender…

 

US selfie biometrics test RIVR running, chance to dive in for track 2 coming soon

The due date for applications to the second track of the Remote Identity Validation Rally (RIVR) from the U.S. Department…

 

FaceAge biometric tool assesses how old you look, considers your chances of survival

New research published in medical journal The Lancet aims to develop and validate “a deep learning system to estimate biological…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events