FB pixel

Kantara lays out trust-building recommendations for mDLs

Kantara lays out trust-building recommendations for mDLs
 

A global digital ID association has published steps vendors and others need to take in order to build effective mobile driving license services that also put ID holders in control of their identity.

The Kantara Initiative’s report starts from the premise that trust in mobile driving licenses grows with the degree of control that license holders have over the documents, their privacy and their biometric identifiers.

Privacy and digital ID-related requirements and expectations identified in the report pertain to all ISO/IEC 18013-5-compliant credentials in the pursuit of “robust and privacy-protective” systems for stakeholders.

The organization notes that the interface between issuing authority infrastructure and the mobile driver’s license is out of scope of ISO 18013-5, while those between the mDL and mDL reader and the reader and issuer are covered by the standard

The report surveys other standards and guidance being formulated. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) has looked into public key collection and dissemination solutions, as it seeks to stand up a Verified Issuer Certificate Authority List (VICAL). The AAMVA has also issued guidelines for issuing authorities on how to administer mDLs. The Identity Council of the Secure Technology Alliance (STA), meanwhile, has published a set of educational materials and resources for participants within the mDL ecosystem.

Eleven categories of risk considerations are listed, including for establishing consent, purpose legitimacy, collection limitation, data minimization and use, retention and disclosure limitation. Data flows for various use cases are defined and mapped out. These considerations state the importance of “proof of presence” in online transactions with mDLs, likely in the form of biometrics.

The Kantara authors write that their requirements will enable relying parties — anyone relying on validity of a person’s or process’ authenticators and credentials — to give mobile license holders a significant and “potentially verifiable” assurance about how their private data is protected.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events