FB pixel

Fed surveillance oversight board stuck in neutral, Biden busy elsewhere

 

cctv-security-systems

President Joe Biden has yet to fill three vacancies on a five-person board created after 9/11 to monitor how the government balances national security and civil liberty.

Numerous U.S. rights groups have written to the White House demanding that Biden’s actions now mirror his campaign rhetoric about reining in secret and unfettered federal surveillance.

Most of the groups have been around long enough to know that the power to surveil in general has only grown since the 9/11 attacks. Facial recognition efforts have particularly grown.

Domestic surveillance has very rarely been curbed over the last 50 years and only after historic levels of public pressure.

After all, the nation elected a former director of the CIA, George H.W. Bush, president in 1989, and every administration since has found reasons to nibble or slash at privacy rights for national security.

The independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, first staffed in 2012, has been an interesting federal effort. It can interview, take statements and take public testimony from anyone in the executive. It cannot by itself compel testimony.

(The board’s $8.5 million fiscal 2021 budget justification is here.)

But the board is quite powerful in the access that its five members have to records, reviews, even classified surveillance information from the executive branch.

From a civil libertarian point of view, it is essential to have a working board overseeing government actions in as close to real time as possible given the extent to which agencies across the executive branch are using, for example, Clearview AI‘s face biometrics service.

(Clearview has been setting up its own board.)

Even if it was not illegal to do so, the board cannot meet or act until it has a majority of its members present.

Right now, only two board members remain.

One is Edward Felten, the Robert Kahn professor of computer science and public affairs at Princeton University, and a veteran of government service. The other is Travis LeBlanc, partner and vice chair of the cyber, data and privacy practice at Cooley LLP.

One board member left in January, a second in June and the third July 2021.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events