FB pixel

Clearview wants U.S. judge to rethink her decision not to dismiss BIPA counts

Clearview wants U.S. judge to rethink her decision not to dismiss BIPA counts
 

Clearview AI executives are exploring increasingly niche arguments in hopes of keeping their photo-scraping business model alive.

The facial recognition subscription service, marketed in the United States to law enforcement, is mired in U.S. court cases (and many other venues around the world).

For the most part, U.S. plaintiffs say Clearview mined their social media accounts for face photos and then hijacked the image’s biometric identifiers.

Executives this week are trying to get U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman to dismiss multiple counts of alleged privacy piracy.

One argument goes like this: Clearview dumped all of its non-government subscribers about a year ago. That would make the firm a government contractor, which would limit its exposure to some legal actions.

At the time, it seemed that executives wanted to limit their market to appear more focused on altruistic operations aiding police seeking lost adults and trafficked children.

But significantly, viewed as a government contractor, Clearview is not covered by Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, according to reporting by MediaPost.

That law requires businesses acquiring biometric identifiers to get express consent from individuals and other provisions. Fines for violating BIPA are moderate but they can be levied on every single collection.

Executives also want to be freed from accusations that it has violated similar laws in three other states.

A Law Street Media article discusses several other objections that Clearview has raised in class actions that it faces.

One rebuttal, if accepted by Judge Coleman, would overturn a fundamental plank on which BIPA stands — that the non-consensual taking of someone’s biometric data is as real a harm as taking someone’s physical property.

Clearview has had a key patent published a year ago granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Organization last month.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

UN says law enforcement should not use biometrics to surveil protestors

Law enforcement agencies should not use biometric technology to categorize, profile or remotely identify individuals during protests, the United Nations…

 

How to explain the EUDI Wallet? Industry and citizens discuss Europe’s digital ID

The European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet is well on its way towards becoming a reality. To explain the major impact…

 

Decentralize face authentication for control, stronger protection: Youverse

The implementation method of biometric face authentication has become increasingly important in recent years due to the limitations of traditional…

 

Researchers develop display screens with biometric sensor capabilities

Traditional display screens like those built into smartphones require extra sensors for touch control, ambient light, and fingerprint sensing. These…

 

Meta, porn industry and Kansas governor weigh in on age verification

As Europe mulls how to restrict access to certain content for minors, Meta offers its own solution. Meanwhile, U.S. states…

 

As national U.S. data privacy law becomes more likely, critics emerge to point out flaws

The push for comprehensive privacy legislation in the U.S. is gaining momentum, as the proposed American Privacy Rights Act 2024…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events