FB pixel

Dueling memos over how TSA is operating PreCheck biometric travel program

Dueling memos over how TSA is operating PreCheck biometric travel program
 

It might come as a surprise to anyone traveling by air in the United States, but about four years ago, a now-deceased federal security director filed an anonymous whistleblower complaint alleging Transportation Security Administration agents were cutting corners to keep people moving.

It amounts to mismanagement and presents a danger for the flying public, said the director, whose identity, other than the title, is protected.

They told the federal Office of Special Counsel around 2018 that TSA personnel were allowing passengers traveling with wheelchairs and unidentified other assistive devices to go through low-security PreCheck screening prior to boarding.

PreCheck subscribers provide biometric and biographic data when they enroll and are being used in conjunction with airline digital ID schemes. The government is clear on the fact that the program limits threats, it does not eliminate them.

Only passengers who have been vetted by the government and paid for a program subscription are supposed to have access to PreCheck identification lanes. In other words, it is not a freebie that can be offered at the discretion of a TSA agent.

The whistleblower also reportedly told the Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that investigates and prosecutes political corruption, that the TSA was potentially under-scrutinizing bags being X-rayed.

TSA officials say they have not changed the risk-based, intelligence-driven screening approach they adopted in 2013. An inspector general in the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the TSA, has backed that assessment.

Passengers who are PreCheck members are identified by “technology” and agents at a document-check podium. A sign-off by both are required to get into the low-friction PreCheck lanes, according to a notice posted by TSA officials.

The notice does not address allegations of too-lax bag screening.

The Special Counsel last week strongly disagreed with the inspector general’s report.

What TSA is doing amounts to “gross mismanagement” and presents a “substantial and specific danger to public safety,” according to a redacted memo on the matter, according to Special Counsel.

The Special Counsel sent its finding to the White House. A timeline, if any, for reconciling the two narratives has not been announced.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

US Justice developing AI use guidelines for law enforcement, civil rights

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to advance draft guidelines for the use of AI and biometric tools like…

 

Airport authorities expand biometrics deployments with Thales, Idemia tech

Biometric deployments involving Thales, Idemia and Vision-Box, alongside agencies like the TSA,  highlight the aviation industry’s commitment to streamlining operations….

 

Age assurance laws for social media prove slippery

Age verification for social media remains a fluid issue across regions, as stakeholders argue their positions to courts and governments,…

 

ZeroBiometrics passes pioneering BixeLab biometric template protection test

ZeroBiometrics’ face biometrics software meets the specifications for template protection set out in the ISO/IEC 30136, according to a pioneering…

 

Apple patent filing aims for reuse of digital ID without sacrificing privacy

A patent filing from Apple for ensuring a presented reusable digital ID belongs to the person holding it via selfie…

 

Publication of ISO standard sets up biometric bias tests and measurement

The international standard for measuring biometric bias, or demographic differentials, is now available for purchase and preview from the International…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events