FB pixel

Mistaken arrest in Georgia triggered by false facial recognition match in different state

Mistaken arrest in Georgia triggered by false facial recognition match in different state
 

Racial bias in facial recognition is getting a close-up, after police in Georgia used facial biometrics to arrest a man on a fugitive warrant from a state he’d never been to, AP reports.

Twenty-eight-year-old Randal Reid was detained in DeKalb County, Georgia, in late November 2022, after authorities in Louisiana used facial recognition algorithms to erroneously link him to a purse theft incident in Baton Rouge.

“They told me I had a warrant out of Jefferson Parish,” Reid told the Times-Picayune. “I said, ‘what is Jefferson Parish?’ I have never been to Louisiana.”

Reid was released after five days. But the case raises fresh concerns about the accuracy of facial recognition in use by law enforcement, who has jurisdictional authority over biometric data, and the use of safeguards. Reid reportedly had a mole on his face that was not recognized by FRT. His attorney, Tommy Calogero, estimated a difference of 40 pounds between Reid and the figure captured by surveillance cameras, to whom he was linked.

Official laws say face recognition tools can only be used to generate leads, and only after the filing of a vetted formal request, measures meant to curb misuse. But Reid was arrested after a botched ID in Jefferson Parish prompted an official in Baton Rogue to issue a warrant, which then triangulated with authorities in Georgia — a case of broken telephone, but with facial recognition data.

The use of face scans and AI-assisted facial recognition software by law enforcement has been hotly debated in the U.S., and intersected with conversations about racial injustice, with studies showing that FRT is more likely to misidentify Black people and people of colour. And there have been previous cases of mistaken arrests resulting partly from the use of facial recognition.

These concerns over misconduct come in the wake of a pandemic in which authorities used information collected as part of the global response to COVID-19, to ramp up surveillance and other security measures.

Despite this, a 2022 Pew Research Centre report found that Americans were more likely to see facial recognition by police as being good, rather than bad for society.

In the same report, however, 66 percent of U.S. adults said they thought facial recognition technology would be used to monitor Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods much more frequently than other neighbourhoods.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events