FB pixel

UK police employ facial recognition at Beyonce concert, despite mounting criticism

 

UK police employed facial recognition technology at a Beyonce concert in Cardiff, Wales, which is estimated to have attracted around 60,000 people.

The technology was not employed inside the Cardiff Principality Stadium itself, but rather in the surrounding city center on Queen Street.

The police force justified the use of the technology as supporting the “identification of persons wanted for priority offenses,” and to help arrest people “wanted on a warrant or unlawfully at large/recall to prison,” as well as to help safeguard children and vulnerable people.

The locations where facial recognition was used were clearly marked with signs.

The use of facial recognition at large events is common in the UK more widely. The recent coronation of King Charles saw 68,000 people have their biometric data scanned. 

The South Wales police have previously deployed facial recognition during a Wales V Italy rugby match in March 2022. As per the official documentation, 87,611 people were seen by the tech, with their biometric data cross-referenced against the data of 607 people, leading to three alerts, with two arrests.

Despite these major rollouts, facial recognition use by police forces is a topic that is seeing widespread scrutiny from both within and outside the government.

In the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner’s annual report for 2021-2022, Professor Fraser Sampson found that: “Effective oversight of police surveillance and their retention and use of biometrics generally is an important part of the wider trust and confidence agenda.”

The commissioner also acknowledged that: “Biometric surveillance technologies can undoubtedly be intrusive to privacy and raise other human rights considerations,” but also acknowledged that there is “no question that they can also be powerful weapons.”

Outside of government, Big Brother Watch’s Legal and Policy Officer Madeleine Stone, a UK-based pro-privacy non-profit, said that: “Live facial recognition is not referenced in a single UK law, has never been debated in parliament, and is one of the most privacy-intrusive technologies ever used in British policing.

“This dystopian technology should not be anywhere near the Coronation.”

She added: “The Home Secretary should urgently ban police use of live facial recognition.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

QTSPs face end-2026 deadline for biometric attack testing under eIDAS

Qualified trust service providers (QTSPs) that verify identities remotely have until the end of 2026 to complete required biometric testing…

 

DHS biometric overhaul remains tied to Thales as HART deadline passes

Eight days after DHS was supposed to bring its long-delayed HART biometric system into initial operation, the department was still…

 

Türkiye’s age assurance law sets minimum age of 15 for having social media accounts

Starting on November 1, 2026, Türkiye will require users to be at least 15 before using social media, and will…

 

Denmark moves to give people legal control over deepfake likenesses

In the classic 1989 sequel, Ghostbusters II, the character Peter Venkman asks the mayor of New York City, “have you…

 

Bangladesh weighs Securiport proposal for biometric‑driven border modernization

Bangladesh is considering an overhaul of its immigration and border management systems centered on biometric identity verification and passenger screening….

 

New World Bank funding to support Rwanda’s digital ID rollout, CRVS digitization

Rwandan lawmakers have approved about $19 million in additional World Bank financing to support the national digital ID rollout and…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events