FB pixel

UK police employ facial recognition at Beyonce concert, despite mounting criticism

 

UK police employed facial recognition technology at a Beyonce concert in Cardiff, Wales, which is estimated to have attracted around 60,000 people.

The technology was not employed inside the Cardiff Principality Stadium itself, but rather in the surrounding city center on Queen Street.

The police force justified the use of the technology as supporting the “identification of persons wanted for priority offenses,” and to help arrest people “wanted on a warrant or unlawfully at large/recall to prison,” as well as to help safeguard children and vulnerable people.

The locations where facial recognition was used were clearly marked with signs.

The use of facial recognition at large events is common in the UK more widely. The recent coronation of King Charles saw 68,000 people have their biometric data scanned. 

The South Wales police have previously deployed facial recognition during a Wales V Italy rugby match in March 2022. As per the official documentation, 87,611 people were seen by the tech, with their biometric data cross-referenced against the data of 607 people, leading to three alerts, with two arrests.

Despite these major rollouts, facial recognition use by police forces is a topic that is seeing widespread scrutiny from both within and outside the government.

In the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner’s annual report for 2021-2022, Professor Fraser Sampson found that: “Effective oversight of police surveillance and their retention and use of biometrics generally is an important part of the wider trust and confidence agenda.”

The commissioner also acknowledged that: “Biometric surveillance technologies can undoubtedly be intrusive to privacy and raise other human rights considerations,” but also acknowledged that there is “no question that they can also be powerful weapons.”

Outside of government, Big Brother Watch’s Legal and Policy Officer Madeleine Stone, a UK-based pro-privacy non-profit, said that: “Live facial recognition is not referenced in a single UK law, has never been debated in parliament, and is one of the most privacy-intrusive technologies ever used in British policing.

“This dystopian technology should not be anywhere near the Coronation.”

She added: “The Home Secretary should urgently ban police use of live facial recognition.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Privado ID CEO Evin McMullen has strong words for AI’s effect on the internet

The window to save the internet’s reputation is closing. That is the stark warning of Evin McMullen, CEO and co-founder…

 

Biometrics projects scale to meet great expectations, from borders to payments

Biometrics projects are graduating to production, reaching scale milestones and expanding dramatically in the top stories of the week on…

 

ICE using data and probability to decide where to detain and arrest people

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enhanced Leads Identification & Targeting for Enforcement (ELITE) tool is being used to identify “targets”…

 

In AI era, identity is about governance, Microblink’s Hartley Thompson tells BU Podcast

“One of the defining things in my life is change,” says Hartley Thompson of Microblink. “How do you react to…

 

CLR Labs wins funding to support biometrics, IAD, digital wallet standardization

Cabinet Louis Reynaud (CLR Labs) has won funding from a French government program to support its standardization efforts in biometrics,…

 

Checkr crossed $800M gross in 2025 as biometric background checks expand

Biometric background check provider Checkr is celebrating 2025 as its most successful year ever, with gross revenue surpassing $800 million…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events