FB pixel

New Yorkers sue Amazon, Starbucks over biometrics use in cashierless stores

New Yorkers sue Amazon, Starbucks over biometrics use in cashierless stores
 

Amazon and coffee retailer Starbucks are being sued in U.S. federal district court for misusing customers’ biometric identifiers.

The proposed class action (2:23-cv-00852) has been filed in the Western District Court of Washington. The named plaintiffs, Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan, claim their privacy rights were violated when visiting New York City stores that used Amazon’s One palm biometric scanners.

(The trio had filed separate cases but joined their claims in the state of Washington, which is home to both defendants.)

No specific sum is sought in the trial.

Biometric authentication as a method of payment at Amazon’s Go stores was introduced in New York City in 2019. One scanners have since been added to other stores owned by Amazon. It is also alleged that Amazon uses a person’s size and shape to identify them in the stores.

Each plaintiff alleges that Amazon is violating a 2021 city law by scanning palms without first posting required notices. That year, Starbucks went into business with Amazon in the first of multiple Starbucks-Go stores.

Plaintiff court documents charge that Starbucks “sells, trades and shares customers’ biometric identifier information with Amazon in exchange for various things of value, and otherwise profits” from the deal.

Specifically, the defendants are charged with “collecting, retaining, storing, converting, using, sharing and profiting” from hand geometries in violation of New York City’s Biometric Identifier Information Law (BII Law).

The defendants were obligated by the law to post caution signs on entry doors, but reportedly failed to do so.

According to court documents, the plaintiffs wrote to Amazon complaining about the alleged violations. One plaintiff also wrote to Starbucks but received to reply.

Amazon did not reply to all of the plaintiffs. In the case where the company did reply, it reportedly did not expressly respond in writing saying the situation had been cured, in legal lingo.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

AI deepfakes push biometric industry toward measurable assurance

The rise of AI-generated deepfakes and injection attacks is reshaping how organizations evaluate biometric security systems, pushing the industry toward…

 

Security, ruggedness key for reliable biometric physical access control tools

A recent webinar from Biometric Update and Goode Intelligence opens up the hood on the 2026 Biometric Physical Access Control…

 

Trident pivots to multi‑vertical holding company focused on sovereign digital infrastructure

Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd. is overhauling its corporate structure to strengthen focus on its offerings for national digital economies….

 

South Africa Home Affairs seeks $828M budget for digital ID, biometric visa projects

South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs has tabled a budget of 13.8 billion Rand (about US$828 million) in parliament for…

 

NIST biometric age estimation update show demographic, accuracy gains

Demographic disparities and mean error rates are falling among the newest age estimation and verification algorithms submitted to the U.S.’…

 

Identity verification becomes core compliance infrastructure across regulated sectors

Identity verification is increasingly becoming embedded operational infrastructure across regulated industries as tighter AML, KYC and fraud-prevention requirements push organizations…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events