FB pixel

New Yorkers sue Amazon, Starbucks over biometrics use in cashierless stores

New Yorkers sue Amazon, Starbucks over biometrics use in cashierless stores
 

Amazon and coffee retailer Starbucks are being sued in U.S. federal district court for misusing customers’ biometric identifiers.

The proposed class action (2:23-cv-00852) has been filed in the Western District Court of Washington. The named plaintiffs, Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan, claim their privacy rights were violated when visiting New York City stores that used Amazon’s One palm biometric scanners.

(The trio had filed separate cases but joined their claims in the state of Washington, which is home to both defendants.)

No specific sum is sought in the trial.

Biometric authentication as a method of payment at Amazon’s Go stores was introduced in New York City in 2019. One scanners have since been added to other stores owned by Amazon. It is also alleged that Amazon uses a person’s size and shape to identify them in the stores.

Each plaintiff alleges that Amazon is violating a 2021 city law by scanning palms without first posting required notices. That year, Starbucks went into business with Amazon in the first of multiple Starbucks-Go stores.

Plaintiff court documents charge that Starbucks “sells, trades and shares customers’ biometric identifier information with Amazon in exchange for various things of value, and otherwise profits” from the deal.

Specifically, the defendants are charged with “collecting, retaining, storing, converting, using, sharing and profiting” from hand geometries in violation of New York City’s Biometric Identifier Information Law (BII Law).

The defendants were obligated by the law to post caution signs on entry doors, but reportedly failed to do so.

According to court documents, the plaintiffs wrote to Amazon complaining about the alleged violations. One plaintiff also wrote to Starbucks but received to reply.

Amazon did not reply to all of the plaintiffs. In the case where the company did reply, it reportedly did not expressly respond in writing saying the situation had been cured, in legal lingo.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

UNICEF in search of firm to co-design youth digital credentialing system

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), under its Generation Unlimited (GenU) initiative, is looking for a company to create and…

 

South Korea prepares for more digital wallets thanks to won-backed stablecoins

As South Korea’s quest to legalize won-denominated stablecoins enters its final stages, the market is preparing new digital wallets that…

 

India’s DPI model continues global expansion with 23 country partnerships

India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Stack, commonly known as India Stack, keeps inspiring nations around the world with more of…

 

Identity must be continuous, says Prove State of Identity Report 2026

Are you still you? It’s not a philosophical question or an episode of The Twilight Zone, but a key question…

 

Movement to get kids off social media gains momentum in EU

The snowball is officially rolling. In the wake of Australia’s landmark Social Media Minimum Age act, the movement to get…

 

Australian state of Victoria kicks off digital birth certificate pilot

After New South Wales, the Australian state of Victoria is also introducing digital birth certificates, enabling parents to view and…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events